260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12169034)
1. Microbial profile on metallic and ceramic bracket materials.
Anhoury P; Nathanson D; Hughes CV; Socransky S; Feres M; Chou LL
Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):338-43. PubMed ID: 12169034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Molecular detection of in-vivo microbial contamination of metallic orthodontic brackets by checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization.
Andrucioli MC; Nelson-Filho P; Matsumoto MA; Saraiva MC; Feres M; de Figueiredo LC; Martins LP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jan; 141(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 22196182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Salivary Streptococcus mutans levels in patients with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Pandis N; Papaioannou W; Kontou E; Nakou M; Makou M; Eliades T
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 19474229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Salivary microbiota levels in relation to periodontal status, experience of caries and miswak use in Sudanese adults.
Darout IA; Albandar JM; Skaug N; Ali RW
J Clin Periodontol; 2002 May; 29(5):411-20. PubMed ID: 12060423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Association of Eubacterium nodatum and Treponema denticola with human periodontitis lesions.
Haffajee AD; Teles RP; Socransky SS
Oral Microbiol Immunol; 2006 Oct; 21(5):269-82. PubMed ID: 16922925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between polymerase chain reaction-based and checkerboard DNA hybridization techniques for microbial assessment of subgingival plaque samples.
Haffajee AD; Yaskell T; Torresyap G; Teles R; Socransky SS
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 36(8):642-9. PubMed ID: 19563330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: a single-blinded randomized longitudinal clinical study. II. Microbiological results.
Persson GR; Samuelsson E; Lindahl C; Renvert S
J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Jun; 37(6):563-73. PubMed ID: 20507380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adhesion of mutans streptococci to self-ligating ceramic brackets: in vivo quantitative analysis with real-time polymerase chain reaction.
Jung WS; Yang IH; Lim WH; Baek SH; Kim TW; Ahn SJ
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):565-9. PubMed ID: 25564502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study.
Habibi M; Nik TH; Hooshmand T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):675-9. PubMed ID: 18005843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Molecular detection of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans on metallic brackets by the checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization technique.
Nelson-Filho P; Carpio-Horta KO; Andrucioli MC; Feres M; Bezerra da Silva RA; Garcia Paula-Silva FW; Romano FL
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Oct; 142(4):481-6. PubMed ID: 22999671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microbiologic changes in subgingival plaque after removal of fixed orthodontic appliances.
Choi DS; Cha BK; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Lee SY; Chang BS; Jang I; Song JS
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1149-55. PubMed ID: 19852608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.
Ozcan M; Finnema K; Ybema A
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18209212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of different orthodontic appliances upon microbial communities.
Ireland AJ; Soro V; Sprague SV; Harradine NW; Day C; Al-Anezi S; Jenkinson HF; Sherriff M; Dymock D; Sandy JR
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 May; 17(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 24345204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bond strengths and debonding characteristics of two types of polycrystalline ceramic brackets.
Lemke K; Xu X; Hagan JL; Armbruster PC; Ballard RW
Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 21175022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new type ceramic bracket for suppression of resin remaining in debonding.
Kinami H; Sugimura M; Sakuda M; Okazaki M; Kimura H
J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1990 Dec; 30():106-14. PubMed ID: 2130164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative analysis of long-term biofilm formation on metal and ceramic brackets.
Lindel ID; Elter C; Heuer W; Heidenblut T; Stiesch M; Schwestka-Polly R; Demling AP
Angle Orthod; 2011 Sep; 81(5):907-14. PubMed ID: 21542722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of different debonding techniques on the debonding forces and failure modes of ceramic brackets in simulated clinical set-ups.
Chen HY; Su MZ; Chang HF; Chen YJ; Lan WH; Lin CP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 18005844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prevalence of cariogenic streptococci on incisor brackets detected by polymerase chain reaction.
Ahn SJ; Lim BS; Lee SJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jun; 131(6):736-41. PubMed ID: 17561051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gram-negative periodontal pathogens and bacterial endotoxin in metallic orthodontic brackets with or without an antimicrobial agent: an in-vivo study.
Nelson-Filho P; Valdez RM; Andrucioli MC; Saraiva MC; Feres M; Sorgi CA; Faccioli LH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):e281-7. PubMed ID: 22133962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
