260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12169034)
21. Evaluation of shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic brackets bonded to enamel prepared with self-etching primer.
Uysal T; Ustdal A; Kurt G
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Apr; 32(2):214-8. PubMed ID: 19509345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of the microbiota of primary endodontic infections using checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization.
Sassone L; Fidel R; Figueiredo L; Fidel S; Faveri M; Feres M
Oral Microbiol Immunol; 2007 Dec; 22(6):390-7. PubMed ID: 17949342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. In vivo evaluation of the effect of essential oil-containing oral strips on salivary bacteria using the checkerboard method.
da Silva CM; Colombo AV; do Souto RM; Colombo AP
J Clin Dent; 2005; 16(2):38-43. PubMed ID: 16170974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Colony forming unit levels of salivary Lactobacilli and Streptococcus mutans in orthodontic patients.
Kupietzky A; Majumdar AK; Shey Z; Binder R; Matheson PB
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2005; 30(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 16302600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Correlations between bacterial levels in autologous subgingival plaque and saliva of adult Sudanese.
Darout IA; Albandar JM; Skaug N
Clin Oral Investig; 2002 Dec; 6(4):210-6. PubMed ID: 12483235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Enamel demineralization with two forms of archwire ligation investigated using an in situ caries model--a pilot study.
Gameiro GH; Nouer DF; Cenci MS; Cury JA
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):542-6. PubMed ID: 19342424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Use of the checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridisation technique for in vivo detection of cariogenic microorganisms on metallic brackets, with or without use of an antimicrobial agent.
Nelson-Filho P; Olmedo LY; Andrucioli MC; Saraiva Mda C; Matsumoto MA; de Queiroz AM; da Silva RA; da Silva LA
J Dent; 2011 Jul; 39(7):513-7. PubMed ID: 21620927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical comparison of an adhesive precoated vs. an uncoated ceramic bracket system.
Verstrynge A; Ghesquiere A; Willems G
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2004 Feb; 7(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 14989750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with metal slot inserts.
Rajakulendran J; Jones S
Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17203579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods.
Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket.
Liu JK; Chung CH; Chang CY; Shieh DB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):761-5; quiz 802. PubMed ID: 16360918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of sustained-release chlorhexidine varnish on Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces viscosus in orthodontic patients.
Beyth N; Redlich M; Harari D; Friedman M; Steinberg D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):345-8. PubMed ID: 12637907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Caries-related plaque microcosm biofilms developed in microplates.
Filoche SK; Soma KJ; Sissons CH
Oral Microbiol Immunol; 2007 Apr; 22(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 17311629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of different ceramic bracket base designs.
Olsen ME; Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 9188961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of esthetic brackets' resistance to torsional forces from the archwire.
Nishio C; Mendes Ade M; Almeida MA; Tanaka E; Tanne K; Elias CN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 19121499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of the bracket types on microbial colonization and periodontal status.
Uzuner FD; Kaygisiz E; Cankaya ZT
Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):1062-7. PubMed ID: 24731062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Static friction, surface roughness, and antibacterial activity of orthodontic brackets coated with silver and silver chitosan nanoparticles.
Tawakal MS; Abdelghany Metwally AM; El-Wassefy NA; Tawfik MA; Shamaa MS
J World Fed Orthod; 2023 Dec; 12(6):260-268. PubMed ID: 37709635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of oral health education on dental plaque development and the level of caries-related Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus spp.
Smiech-Slomkowska G; Jablonska-Zrobek J
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 17488998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Debonding forces applied to ceramic brackets simulating clinical conditions.
Bishara SE; Forrseca JM; Fehr DE; Boyer DB
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 7978522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
