These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12169412)

  • 1. Use or misuse of the selection task? Rejoinder to Fiddick, Cosmides, and Tooby.
    Sperber D; Girotto V
    Cognition; 2002 Oct; 85(3):277-90. PubMed ID: 12169412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No interpretation without representation: the role of domain-specific representations and inferences in the Wason selection task.
    Fiddick L; Cosmides L; Tooby J
    Cognition; 2000 Oct; 77(1):1-79. PubMed ID: 10980253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dissecting the computational architecture of social inference mechanisms.
    Cosmides L; Tooby J
    Ciba Found Symp; 1997; 208():132-56; discussion 156-61. PubMed ID: 9386910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The logic of social exchange: has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task.
    Cosmides L
    Cognition; 1989 Apr; 31(3):187-276. PubMed ID: 2743748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Darwinian algorithms and the Wason selection task: a factorial analysis of social contract selection task problems.
    Platt RD; Griggs RA
    Cognition; 1993 Aug; 48(2):163-92. PubMed ID: 8243031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [An item response theory analysis of the four-card selection task].
    Nakamura K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2009 Dec; 80(5):436-41. PubMed ID: 20095447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reasoning versus text processing in the Wason selection task: a nondeontic perspective on perspective effects.
    Almor A; Sloman SA
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Sep; 28(6):1060-70. PubMed ID: 11105532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reasoning, biases and dual processes: The lasting impact of Wason (1960).
    Evans JS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Oct; 69(10):2076-92. PubMed ID: 25158629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Social exchange and inference: an experimental study with the Wason selection task].
    Hayashi N
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2001 Apr; 72(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 11494657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Probabilities and utilities of fictional outcomes in Wason's four-card selection task.
    Kirby KN
    Cognition; 1994 Jan; 51(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 8149715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Domain-specific reasoning: social contracts, cheating, and perspective change.
    Gigerenzer G; Hug K
    Cognition; 1992 May; 43(2):127-71. PubMed ID: 1617917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The origin of conditional logic: does a cheater detection module exist?
    Lawson AE
    J Genet Psychol; 2002 Dec; 163(4):425-44. PubMed ID: 12495229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perspectives on Correctness in Probabilistic Inference from Psychology.
    Pothos EM; Basieva I; Khrennikov A; Yearsley JM
    Span J Psychol; 2019 Dec; 22():E55. PubMed ID: 31868162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A quantitative model of optimal data selection in Wason's selection task.
    Hattori M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Oct; 55(4):1241-72. PubMed ID: 12420994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Behav Brain Sci; 2009 Feb; 32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. PubMed ID: 19210833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using dual-process theory and analogical transfer to explain facilitation on a hypothetico-deductive reasoning task.
    Koenig CS; Platt RD; Griggs RA
    Psychol Res; 2007 Jul; 71(4):495-502. PubMed ID: 16586101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can tutoring improve performance on a reasoning task under deadline conditions?
    Osman M
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Mar; 35(2):342-51. PubMed ID: 17645175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The abstract selection task: new data and an almost comprehensive model.
    Klauer KC; Stahl C; Erdfelder E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jul; 33(4):680-703. PubMed ID: 17576147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deontic reasoning with emotional content: evolutionary psychology or decision theory?
    Perham N; Oaksford M
    Cogn Sci; 2005 Sep; 29(5):681-718. PubMed ID: 21702790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal data selection: revision, review, and reevaluation.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Jun; 10(2):289-318. PubMed ID: 12921410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.