These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12169412)
21. Reasoning, decision making and rationality. Evans JS; Over DE; Manktelow KI Cognition; 1993; 49(1-2):165-87. PubMed ID: 8287673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Developing a theoretical understanding of therapy techniques: an illustrative analogue study. Freeman D; Garety PA; McGuire P; Kuipers E Br J Clin Psychol; 2005 Jun; 44(Pt 2):241-54. PubMed ID: 16004658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Decisions in conditional situation and theory of mind in schizotypy]. Monestes JL; Villatte M; Moore A; Yon V; Loas G Encephale; 2008 Apr; 34(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 18597718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Set-shifting and inhibition interplay affect the rule-matching bias occurrence during conditional reasoning task. Hashemi SFS; Khosrowabadi R; Karimi M J Med Life; 2022 Jun; 15(6):828-834. PubMed ID: 35928360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Relevance theory explains the selection task. Sperber D; Cara F; Girotto V Cognition; 1995 Oct; 57(1):31-95. PubMed ID: 7587018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Inept reasoners or pragmatic virtuosos? Relevance and the deontic selection task. Girotto V; Kemmelmeier M; Sperber D; van der Henst JB Cognition; 2001 Sep; 81(2):B69-76. PubMed ID: 11376645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Alternative antecedents, probabilities, and the suppression of fallacies in Wason's selection task. Handley SJ; Feeney A; Harper C Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jul; 55(3):799-818. PubMed ID: 12188514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Misinterpretation of conditional statements in Wason's selection task. Osman M; Laming D Psychol Res; 2001; 65(2):128-44. PubMed ID: 11414005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Representational and executive selection resources in 'theory of mind': evidence from compromised belief-desire reasoning in old age. German TP; Hehman JA Cognition; 2006 Aug; 101(1):129-52. PubMed ID: 16288734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The elusive matching bias effect in the disjunctive selection task. Roberts MJ Exp Psychol; 2002; 49(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 12053535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Why are we good at detecting cheaters? A reply to Fodor. Beaman CP Cognition; 2002 Mar; 83(2):215-20; discussion 221. PubMed ID: 11869725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Developmental dynamics and contemporary evolutionary psychology: status quo or irreconcilable views? Reply to Bjorklund (2003), Krebs (2003), Buss and Reeve (2003), Crawford (2003), and Tooby et Al. (2003). Lickliter R; Honeycutt H Psychol Bull; 2003 Nov; 129(6):866-72. PubMed ID: 14599285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Utilities in the 2-4-6 task. Vallée-Tourangeau F Exp Psychol; 2012 Jan; 59(5):265-71. PubMed ID: 22580407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Response selection in dual task paradigms: observations from random generation tasks. Dirnberger G; Jahanshahi M Exp Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 201(3):535-48. PubMed ID: 20232508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Transfer of conditional reasoning: effects of explanations and initial problem types. Klaczynski PA; Gelfand H; Reese HW Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):208-20. PubMed ID: 2927318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]