BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

595 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12170856)

  • 1. Does a prosthodontist spend more time providing mandibular two-implant overdentures than conventional dentures?
    Takanashi Y; Penrod JR; Chehade A; Klemetti E; Savard A; Lund JP; Feine JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 12170856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A cost comparison of mandibular two-implant overdenture and conventional denture treatment.
    Takanashi Y; Penrod JR; Lund JP; Feine JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 15119869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
    MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship between prosthodontic evaluation and patient ratings of mandibular conventional and implant prostheses.
    Heydecke G; Klemetti E; Awad MA; Lund JP; Feine JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 12854797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery.
    Thomason JM; Lund JP; Chehade A; Feine JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 14651229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants.
    Walton JN; Glick N; Macentee MI
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19639067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.
    Visser A; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 16752625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
    Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial.
    Walton JN; MacEntee MI; Glick N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 12074455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures.
    Abd El-Dayem MA; Assad AS; Eldin Sanad ME; Mahmoud Mogahed SA
    Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):501-11. PubMed ID: 20009604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment.
    Burns DR; Unger JW; Coffey JP; Waldrop TC; Elswick RK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jul; 106(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 21723989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population.
    Awad MA; Lund JP; Shapiro SH; Locker D; Klemetti E; Chehade A; Savard A; Feine JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 12956494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-implant mandibular overdentures: simple to fabricate and easy to wear.
    Klemetti E; Chehade A; Takanashi Y; Feine JS
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Jan; 69(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 12556267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mandibular implant overdentures followed for over 10 years: patient compliance and prosthetic maintenance.
    Rentsch-Kollar A; Huber S; Mericske-Stern R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 20305844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study.
    Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A short-term clinical trial on selected outcomes for immediately loaded implant-supported mandibular overdentures.
    Turkyilmaz I; Tumer C; Avci M; Hersek N; Celik-Bagci E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):515-9. PubMed ID: 17323733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in the edentulous maxilla in persons wearing implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Närhi TO; Geertman ME; Hevinga M; Abdo H; Kalk W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 10898841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Denture satisfaction in a comparative study of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a randomized clinical trial.
    Geertman ME; van Waas MA; van 't Hof MA; Kalk W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 8666450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An economic evaluation of implant treatment in edentulous patients-preliminary results.
    Zitzmann NU; Sendi P; Marinello CP
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 15754888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immediate loading of implants with mandibular overdentures: one-year clinical results of a prospective study.
    Attard NJ; David LA; Zarb GA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(6):463-70. PubMed ID: 16335163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.