These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12171411)

  • 1. A new rechargeable dialysis pore water sampler for monitoring sub-aqueous in-situ sediment caps.
    Jacobs PH
    Water Res; 2002 Jul; 36(12):3121-9. PubMed ID: 12171411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-dimensional small-scale variability of pore water phosphate in freshwater lakes: results from a novel dialysis sampler.
    Lewandowski J; Rüter K; Hupfer M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2002 May; 36(9):2039-47. PubMed ID: 12026990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of an in situ passive sampling system for metals in stormwater.
    Björklund Blom L; Morrison GM; Kingston J; Mills GA; Greenwood R; Pettersson TJ; Rauch S
    J Environ Monit; 2002 Apr; 4(2):258-62. PubMed ID: 11993766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new collector for in situ pore water sampling in wetland sediment.
    Gao F; Deng J; Li Q; Hu L; Zhu J; Hang H; Hu W
    Environ Technol; 2012; 33(1-3):257-64. PubMed ID: 22519110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In situ measurement of PCB pore water concentration profiles in activated carbon-amended sediment using passive samplers.
    Oen AM; Janssen EM; Cornelissen G; Breedveld GD; Eek E; Luthy RG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 May; 45(9):4053-9. PubMed ID: 21473574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A high-resolution dialysis technique for rapid determination of dissolved reactive phosphate and ferrous iron in pore water of sediments.
    Xu D; Wu W; Ding S; Sun Q; Zhang C
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Apr; 421-422():245-52. PubMed ID: 22381029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new sampler for stratified lagoon chemical and microbiological assessments.
    McLaughlin MR; Brooks JP; Adeli A
    Environ Monit Assess; 2014 Jul; 186(7):4097-110. PubMed ID: 24549945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pore water sampling in acid sulfate soils: a new peeper method.
    Johnston SG; Burton ED; Keene AF; Bush RT; Sullivan LA; Isaacson L
    J Environ Qual; 2009; 38(6):2474-7. PubMed ID: 19875804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Building a compact, low-cost, and portable peristaltic sampling pump.
    Woessner WW
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(6):795-7. PubMed ID: 17973758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diffusion sampler for compound specific carbon isotope analysis of dissolved hydrocarbon contaminants.
    Passeport E; Landis R; Mundle SO; Chu K; Mack EE; Lutz E; Lollar BS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9582-90. PubMed ID: 25058598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance optimisation of a passive sampler for monitoring hydrophobic organic pollutants in water.
    Vrana B; Mills G; Greenwood R; Knutsson J; Svensson K; Morrison G
    J Environ Monit; 2005 Jun; 7(6):612-20. PubMed ID: 15931424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metal(loid) speciation and size fractionation in sediment pore water depth profiles examined with a new meso profiling system.
    Schroeder H; Fabricius AL; Ecker D; Ternes TA; Duester L
    Chemosphere; 2017 Jul; 179():185-193. PubMed ID: 28365504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct-push geochemical profiling for assessment of inorganic chemical heterogeneity in aquifers.
    Schulmeister MK; Healey JM; Butler JJ; McCall GW
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Apr; 69(3-4):215-32. PubMed ID: 15028392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimization of a pressurization methodology for extracting pore-water.
    Lopes I; Ribeiro R
    Chemosphere; 2005 Dec; 61(10):1505-11. PubMed ID: 15967476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diffusional behaviour of metals in a passive sampling system for monitoring aquatic pollution.
    Persson LB; Morrison GM; Friemann JU; Kingston J; Mill G; Greenwood R
    J Environ Monit; 2001 Dec; 3(6):639-45. PubMed ID: 11785639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MiniSipper: a new in situ water sampler for high-resolution, long-duration acid mine drainage monitoring.
    Chapin TP; Todd AS
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Nov; 439():343-53. PubMed ID: 23103760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A bottom water sampler for determining chemical gradients across the water-sediment interface.
    Chong KY; Liu H; Yin K; Harrison PJ; Kau KK
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2017 Apr; 117(1-2):61-65. PubMed ID: 28139233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sediment Monitored Natural Recovery Evidenced by Compound Specific Isotope Analysis and High-Resolution Pore Water Sampling.
    Passeport E; Landis R; Lacrampe-Couloume G; Lutz EJ; Mack EE; West K; Morgan S; Sherwood Lollar B
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 50(22):12197-12204. PubMed ID: 27771950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monitoring of persistent, lipophilic pollutants in water and sediment by solvent-filled dialysis membranes.
    Södergren A
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1990 Apr; 19(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 2338062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving suspended sediment measurements by automatic samplers.
    Gettel M; Gulliver JS; Kayhanian M; DeGroot G; Brand J; Mohseni O; Erickson AJ
    J Environ Monit; 2011 Oct; 13(10):2703-9. PubMed ID: 21892480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.