192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12173182)
1. Evaluation of passive card monitors for hydrogen sulfide for use in kraft pulp mill workplace atmospheres.
Saunders F; Larson L; Tatum V
AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2002; 63(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 12173182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of portable single-gas monitors for the detection of low levels of hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide in petroleum industry environments.
Hemingway MA; Walsh PT; Hardwick KR; Wilcox G
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(5):319-28. PubMed ID: 22500974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new all-season passive sampling system for monitoring H2S in air.
Tang H; Sandeluk J; Lin L; Lown JW
ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 Jan; 2():155-68. PubMed ID: 12806050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of OSHA method 5 for measuring chloroform in pulp and paper industry workplace and ambient atmospheres.
Crawford RJ; Cloutier SL; Rovell-Rixx DC
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 Mar; 53(3):210-15. PubMed ID: 1642174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Industrial hygiene aspects of a sampling survey at a bleached-kraft pulp mill in British Columbia.
Astrakianakis G; Svirchev L; Tang C; Janssen R; Anderson J; Band P; Le N; Fang R; Bert J
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Oct; 59(10):694-705. PubMed ID: 9794067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laboratory validation and field verification of a new passive colorimetric air monitoring badge for sampling hydrogen sulfide in air.
Kring EV; Damrell DJ; Henry TJ; DeMoor HM; Basilio AN; Simon CE
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Jan; 45(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 6702591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of the determination of hydrogen sulfide in the air of workplace by the detection tube method].
Dai J; Liu WB; Wang C; Deng HF; Yan HF; Ding CG
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2023 Sep; 41(9):676-680. PubMed ID: 37805428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A liquid crystal-based passive badge for personal monitoring of exposure to hydrogen sulfide.
Robinson SE; Grinwald BA; Bremer LL; Kupcho KA; Acharya BR; Owens PD
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2014; 11(11):741-50. PubMed ID: 24766440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determination of hydrogen peroxide in workplace air: interferences and method validation.
Christensen CS; Brødsgaard S; Mortensen P; Egmose K; Linde A
J Environ Monit; 2000 Aug; 2(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 11249789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exposure to hydrogen sulfide, mercaptans and sulfur dioxide in pulp industry.
Kangas J; Jäppinen P; Savolainen H
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Dec; 45(12):787-90. PubMed ID: 6517022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of occupational exposure to sulfur compounds in paper pulp kraft mills.
Goyer N
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Jul; 51(7):390-4. PubMed ID: 2382641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Environmental exposure to hydrogen sulfide in central Slovakia (Ruzomberok area) in context of health risk assessment.
Drimal M; Koppová K; Klöslová Z; Fabiánová E
Cent Eur J Public Health; 2010 Dec; 18(4):224-9. PubMed ID: 21361108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Passive colorimetric dosimeter tubes for ammonia, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide.
McConnaughey PW; McKee ES; Pritts IM
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1985 Jul; 46(7):357-62. PubMed ID: 3939731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of calibration environment on the performance of direct-reading organic vapor monitors.
LeBouf RF; Slaven JE; Coffey CC
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 May; 63(5):528-33. PubMed ID: 23786144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Concentrations of bioaerosols, odors, and hydrogen sulfide inside and downwind from two types of swine livestock operations.
Thorne PS; Ansley AC; Perry SS
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 Apr; 6(4):211-20. PubMed ID: 19177273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Passive monitors to measure hydrogen sulfide near concentrated animal feeding operations.
Pavilonis BT; O'Shaughnessy PT; Altmaier R; Metwali N; Thorne PS
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2013 Jun; 15(6):1271-8. PubMed ID: 23681048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a personal monitor employing an electrochemical sensor for assessing exposure to hydrogen peroxide in the workplace.
Park J; Plese MR; Puskar MA
AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(3):360-7. PubMed ID: 12809542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of the 1990 Hong Kong legislation for restriction on sulfur content in fuel.
Wong CM; Rabl A; Thach TQ; Chau YK; Chan KP; Cowling BJ; Lai HK; Lam TH; McGhee SM; Anderson HR; Hedley AJ
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 Aug; (170):5-91. PubMed ID: 23316618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low-Cost, Distributed Environmental Monitors for Factory Worker Health.
Thomas GW; Sousan S; Tatum M; Liu X; Zuidema C; Fitzpatrick M; Koehler KA; Peters TM
Sensors (Basel); 2018 May; 18(5):. PubMed ID: 29751534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a novel passive sampling technique for monitoring volcanogenic hydrogen sulfide.
Horwell CJ; Allen AG; Mather TA; Patterson JE
J Environ Monit; 2004 Jul; 6(7):630-5. PubMed ID: 15237295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
