These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12173630)
1. The exception that swallowed the rule? Women's Medical Professional Corporation v. Voinovich and the mental health exception to post-viability abortion bans. Wassom BD Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1999; 49(4):799-867. PubMed ID: 12173630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. What the Court giveth: abortion and Bill C-43. Noonan SM Queens Law J; 1991; 16():321-45. PubMed ID: 11656415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Women's Medical Professional Corporation v. Voinovich. U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Fed Report; 1997 Nov; 130():187-219. PubMed ID: 11648426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion: the father's rights. Gilbert RA Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1973; 42(3):441-67. PubMed ID: 11664234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical responsibility for fetal survival under Roe and Doe. Sendor BB Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1975; 10(2):444-71. PubMed ID: 11663614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. So-called "partial birth abortion" bans: bad medicine? Maybe. Bad law? Definitely! Massie AM Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1998; 59(2):301-80. PubMed ID: 11902179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. State regulation of late abortion and the physician's duty of care to the viable fetus. Wood MA; Hawkins LB Miss Law Rev; 1980; 45(3):394-422. PubMed ID: 11664113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The born alive doctrine: a legal anachronism. Westerfield L South Univ Law Rev; 1976; 2(2):149-73. PubMed ID: 12083087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of maternal deaths in the abortion debate. Clowes BW St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):327-80. PubMed ID: 11656614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Banning partial-birth abortions: a few inches away from testing post-viability jurisprudence. Flanagan PP Seton Hall Legis J; 1998; 23(1):141-77. PubMed ID: 16514753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Colautti v. Franklin: the Court questions the use of "viability" in abortion statutes. Bartleman A West State Univ Law Rev; 1979; 6(2):311-323. PubMed ID: 11662770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. U.S. appellate panel rules Ohio ban on late-term abortion is unconstitutional. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1997 Nov; ():A24. PubMed ID: 11647284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion rights after South Dakota. McDonagh E Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Exporting misery. A U.S. abortion ruling affects women's health worldwide. Horgan J Sci Am; 1991 Aug; 265(2):16, 18. PubMed ID: 1862327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Inverting the viability test for abortion law. Ching B Womens Rights Law Report; 2000; 22(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 16281341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Constitutional law--U.S. Supreme Court abortion decision clarifies concept of fetal viability and scope of physician's discretion in determining when viability is reached. Slandell H Temple Law Q; 1979; 52(4):1240-59. PubMed ID: 11664078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Constitutional law: further guidelines for abortion legislation. Oklahoma Law Rev; 1976; 29(3):785-8. PubMed ID: 11664737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Consensual sex without assuming the risk of carrying an unwanted fetus; another foundation for the right to an abortion. Walen A Brooklyn Law Rev; 1997; 63():1051-140. PubMed ID: 12173635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law. Denniston L Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Kassop N PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]