These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12173631)
1. Estate of C.W.: a pragmatic approach to the involuntary sterilization of the mentally disabled. Adler RR Nova Law J; 1996; 20(3):1323-68. PubMed ID: 12173631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. From involuntary sterilization to genetic enhancement: the unsettled legacy of Buck v. Bell. Berry RM Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1999; 12(2):401-48. PubMed ID: 12755089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Involuntary sterilization of mentally retarded minors in Nebraska. Small MA Neb Law Rev; 1989; 68(1):410-29. PubMed ID: 16041875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sterilization of the mentally disabled in Pennsylvania: three generations without legislative guidance are enough. Estacio RA Dickinson Law Rev; 1988; 92(2):409-36. PubMed ID: 11659036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In re Grady--voluntary sterilization and the retarded. Denkin JF Rutgers Law Rev; 1982; 34(3):567-90. PubMed ID: 11658757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sex and the sacred: sterilization and bodily integrity in English and Canadian law. Savell K McGill Law J; 2004 Oct; 49(4):1093-141. PubMed ID: 16482689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Involuntary sterilization: an unconstitutional menace to minorities and the poor. Spriggs EJ Rev Law Soc Change; 1974; 4(2):127-51. PubMed ID: 11664642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A shared history of shame: Sweden's four-decade policy of forced sterilization and the eugenics movement in the United States. Hyatt S Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1998; 8(2):475-503. PubMed ID: 16200697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. In re Moore: the sound and the fury and the scalpel. Henry NB North Carol Centr Law J; 1977; 8(2):307-15. PubMed ID: 11664899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Sterilization, retardation, and parental authority. Dodge GA Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1978; 1978(2):380-407. PubMed ID: 11664962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Substantive due process--compulsory sterilization of the mentally deficient. Chernus RO NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1977; 23(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 11664850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Involuntary sterilization--a constitutional awakening to fundamental human rights. Linn B Amicus; 1977 Feb; 2(2):34-40. PubMed ID: 11664714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Yin and yang: the eugenic policies of the United States and China: is the analysis that black and white? Rodgers G Houst J Int Law; 1999; 22(1):129-68. PubMed ID: 12449957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An examination of Saskatchewan law on the sterilization of persons with mental disabilities. Newman D Sask Law Rev; 1999; 62(1):329-46. PubMed ID: 12680362 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Involuntary sterilization of the mentally retarded: blessing or burden? Coleman SS S D Law Rev; 1980; 25(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 11665097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In re Romero: sterilization and competency. Marcus J Denver Univ Law Rev; 1991; 68(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 16144140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The wicked witch is almost dead: Buck v. Bell and the sterilization of handicapped persons. Burgdorf RL; Burgdorf MP Temple Law Q; 1977; 50(4):995-1034. PubMed ID: 11664886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of statutes authorizing asexualization or sterilization of criminals or mental defectives. Ghent JF Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1973; 53():960-96. PubMed ID: 12091928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]