231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12173635)
1. Consensual sex without assuming the risk of carrying an unwanted fetus; another foundation for the right to an abortion.
Walen A
Brooklyn Law Rev; 1997; 63():1051-140. PubMed ID: 12173635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion: the father's rights.
Gilbert RA
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1973; 42(3):441-67. PubMed ID: 11664234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
McDonagh E
Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Federal funds for abortion.
Packwood RW
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1979 Jul; 125(98):S9850-74. PubMed ID: 11664023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. How technology is reframing the abortion debate.
Callahan D
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 3514547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The abortion funding conundrum: inalienable rights, affirmative duties, and the dilemma of dependence.
Tribe LH
Harv Law Rev; 1985 Nov; 99(1):330-43. PubMed ID: 11655827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The putative father's rights after Roe v. Wade.
Tapovatz WE
St Marys Law J; 1974; 6(2):407-20. PubMed ID: 11663502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes.
Gallagher A
St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Superimposition of being: the collision of maternal and fetal rights.
Kolner SJ
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1990; 53(2):34-7. PubMed ID: 2271021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The free exercise rights of pregnant women who refuse medical treatment.
Cherry AL
Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(3):563-622. PubMed ID: 15378820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The proposed equal protection fix for abortion law: reflections on citizenship, gender, and the Constitution.
Allen AL
Harv J Law Public Policy; 1995; 18(21):419-55. PubMed ID: 11656571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Inverting the viability test for abortion law.
Ching B
Womens Rights Law Report; 2000; 22(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 16281341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The unborn and the born again.
New Repub; 1977 Jul; 177(27):5-6+. PubMed ID: 11663777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses.
Warren MA
Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reconciling fetal/maternal conflicts.
Kim RH
Ida Law Rev; 1990-1991; 27(2):223-48. PubMed ID: 16032814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The legal impact of the Roe and Doe decisions.
Granfield D
Jurist; 1973; 33(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 11663427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Haunting shadows from the rubble of Roe's right of privacy.
Haley JN
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1974; 9(1):145-84. PubMed ID: 11664401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Recent developments in the abortion area.
Scanlan AL
Cathol Lawyer; 1975; 21(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 11661372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion and its viability standard: the woman's diminishing right to choose.
Swyers MH
Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1997; 8(1-2):87-109. PubMed ID: 14628785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The constitutionality of abortion on request in South Africa.
McGregor M; Moore R
E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E3. PubMed ID: 16967565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
