These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12173635)

  • 21. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
    Borgmann CE
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A woman decides: Justice O'Connor and due process rights of choice.
    Davis PC; Gilligan C
    McGeorge Law Rev; 2001; 32(3):895-914. PubMed ID: 16493803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Constitutional law--U.S. Supreme Court abortion decision clarifies concept of fetal viability and scope of physician's discretion in determining when viability is reached.
    Slandell H
    Temple Law Q; 1979; 52(4):1240-59. PubMed ID: 11664078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How far can a state go to protect a fetus? The Rebecca Corneau story and the case for requiring Massachusetts to follow the U.S. Constitution.
    Bower HR
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 2001; 31(1):123-54. PubMed ID: 12666688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
    Weitz TA; Yanow S
    Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reply to Sarah Burns.
    Colker R
    Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():207-14. PubMed ID: 16032808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court. Conclusion: the future of abortion as a "private choice".
    Grant ER
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):233-43. PubMed ID: 2603867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pro-choice: a new militancy.
    Davis SE
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(6):32-3. PubMed ID: 2606658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The maternal-fetal rights dilemma: honoring a woman's choice of medical care during pregnancy.
    Arch RR
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):637-73. PubMed ID: 8666737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. State regulation of late abortion and the physician's duty of care to the viable fetus.
    Wood MA; Hawkins LB
    Miss Law Rev; 1980; 45(3):394-422. PubMed ID: 11664113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Kassop N
    PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inside the womb: interpreting the Ferguson case.
    Weyrauch S
    Duke J Gend Law Policy; 2002; 9():81-90. PubMed ID: 14986666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test.
    Burdick R
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Amendment No. 2413 [(abortion funding[.
    Weicker LP
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1980 Sep; 126(152):S13703-11. PubMed ID: 11664172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Harm to fetuses becomes issue in Utah and elsewhere.
    Johnson K
    N Y Times Web; 2004 Mar; ():A9. PubMed ID: 15250083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Who gets to choose? Responses to the foetal/maternal conflict.
    Hyams R
    E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E7. PubMed ID: 16969923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Compelling pregnancy at death's door.
    Taylor KA
    Columbia J Gend Law; 1997; 7(1):85-165. PubMed ID: 16184655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
    Reilly EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Women's reproductive rights. Is there a conflict with a child's right to be born free from defects?
    Schedler G
    J Leg Med; 1986 Sep; 7(3):357-84. PubMed ID: 3490529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Abortion and maternal-fetal conflict: broadening our concerns.
    Shultz MM
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1992; 1():79-98. PubMed ID: 16437820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.