These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision. Kendall CC John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. On the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2000. Arkes H Hum Life Rev; 2000; 26(4):15-26. PubMed ID: 12530369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Roe v. Wade: what rights the biological father? Georgius EH Hastings Constit Law Q; 1974; 1(1):251-72. PubMed ID: 11664368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The exception that swallowed the rule? Women's Medical Professional Corporation v. Voinovich and the mental health exception to post-viability abortion bans. Wassom BD Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1999; 49(4):799-867. PubMed ID: 12173630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The right of privacy and restraints on abortion under the "undue burden" test: a jurisprudential comparison of Planned Parenthood v. Casey with European practice and Italian law. Ross CS Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1993; 3():199-231. PubMed ID: 12091926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Abortion: state action. Womens Rights Law Report; 1977; 3(3-4):162-9. PubMed ID: 11663757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Slavery rhetoric and the abortion debate. Threedy D Mich J Gend Law; 1994; 2(1):3-25. PubMed ID: 11656519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. The pregnant silence: Rust v. Sullivan, abortion rights, and publicly funded speech. Weeks AB North Carol Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 70(5):1623-68. PubMed ID: 16044600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court. Bertz RC West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. What are the father's rights in abortion? Blackwood R J Leg Med (N Y); 1975 Oct; 3(9):28-36. PubMed ID: 1081113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Rewriting Roe v. Wade. Regan DH Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1569-646. PubMed ID: 10245966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A woman's right to choose: wrongful death statutes and abortion rights--consistent at last. Siano JR Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):279-92. PubMed ID: 15871153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. A maternal duty to protect fetal health? Weinberg SR Indiana Law J; 1983; 58(3):531-46. PubMed ID: 16211746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Location and life: how Stenberg v. Carhart undercut Roe v. Wade. Stith R William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(2):255-78. PubMed ID: 15977326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Fetal exclusion policies and gendered constructions of suitable work. Draper E Soc Probl; 1993 Feb; 40(1):90-107. PubMed ID: 11652221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. After Ayotte: the need to defend abortion rights with renewed "purpose.". Harv Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 119(8):2552-73. PubMed ID: 16827220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Bioethical consideration of maternal-fetal issues. Post LF Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 24(4):757-75. PubMed ID: 12455510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Maternal duties during pregnancy: toward a conceptual framework. Sterns ML New Engl Law Rev; 1985-1986; 21(3):595-634. PubMed ID: 16998992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions. Weissmann R Annu Surv Am Law; 1999; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]