These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12173635)

  • 41. Can technology solve the abortion dilemma?
    Maguire MR
    Christ Century; 1976 Oct; 93(34):918-9. PubMed ID: 11663690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision.
    Kendall CC
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. On the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2000.
    Arkes H
    Hum Life Rev; 2000; 26(4):15-26. PubMed ID: 12530369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Roe v. Wade: what rights the biological father?
    Georgius EH
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1974; 1(1):251-72. PubMed ID: 11664368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The exception that swallowed the rule? Women's Medical Professional Corporation v. Voinovich and the mental health exception to post-viability abortion bans.
    Wassom BD
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1999; 49(4):799-867. PubMed ID: 12173630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The right of privacy and restraints on abortion under the "undue burden" test: a jurisprudential comparison of Planned Parenthood v. Casey with European practice and Italian law.
    Ross CS
    Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1993; 3():199-231. PubMed ID: 12091926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Abortion: state action.
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1977; 3(3-4):162-9. PubMed ID: 11663757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Slavery rhetoric and the abortion debate.
    Threedy D
    Mich J Gend Law; 1994; 2(1):3-25. PubMed ID: 11656519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The pregnant silence: Rust v. Sullivan, abortion rights, and publicly funded speech.
    Weeks AB
    North Carol Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 70(5):1623-68. PubMed ID: 16044600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
    Bertz RC
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. What are the father's rights in abortion?
    Blackwood R
    J Leg Med (N Y); 1975 Oct; 3(9):28-36. PubMed ID: 1081113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Rewriting Roe v. Wade.
    Regan DH
    Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1569-646. PubMed ID: 10245966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A woman's right to choose: wrongful death statutes and abortion rights--consistent at last.
    Siano JR
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):279-92. PubMed ID: 15871153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A maternal duty to protect fetal health?
    Weinberg SR
    Indiana Law J; 1983; 58(3):531-46. PubMed ID: 16211746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Location and life: how Stenberg v. Carhart undercut Roe v. Wade.
    Stith R
    William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(2):255-78. PubMed ID: 15977326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Fetal exclusion policies and gendered constructions of suitable work.
    Draper E
    Soc Probl; 1993 Feb; 40(1):90-107. PubMed ID: 11652221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. After Ayotte: the need to defend abortion rights with renewed "purpose.".
    Harv Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 119(8):2552-73. PubMed ID: 16827220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Bioethical consideration of maternal-fetal issues.
    Post LF
    Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 24(4):757-75. PubMed ID: 12455510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Maternal duties during pregnancy: toward a conceptual framework.
    Sterns ML
    New Engl Law Rev; 1985-1986; 21(3):595-634. PubMed ID: 16998992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions.
    Weissmann R
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1999; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.