These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

472 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12174231)

  • 1. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries.
    Mesleh RA; Al-Sawadi HM; Kurdi AM
    Saudi Med J; 2002 Jul; 23(7):811-3. PubMed ID: 12174231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries.
    Johnson JH; Figueroa R; Garry D; Elimian A; Maulik D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 103(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 14990415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maternal and neonatal outcome after failed ventouse delivery: comparison of forceps versus cesarean section.
    Bhide A; Guven M; Prefumo F; Vankalayapati P; Thilaganathan B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Jul; 20(7):541-5. PubMed ID: 17674268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
    Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of instrument preference for operative deliveries on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.
    Abenhaim HA; Morin L; Benjamin A; Kinch RA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Oct; 134(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 17112650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Beucher G; Dupuis O; Feraud O; Simon-Toulza C; Sentilhes L; Meunier E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Riethmuller D; Baud O; Galley-Raulin F; Diemunsch P; Pierre F; Schaal JP; Fournié A; Oury JF;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized comparison of assisted vaginal delivery by obstetric forceps and polyethylene vacuum cup.
    Williams MC; Knuppel RA; O'Brien WF; Weiss A; Kanarek KS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):789-94. PubMed ID: 1923198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Instrumental (operative) vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction compared with forceps delivery at Ilorin University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.
    Anate M
    West Afr J Med; 1991; 10(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 1911480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of sequential use of vacuum and forceps for assisted vaginal delivery on neonatal and maternal outcomes.
    Gardella C; Taylor M; Benedetti T; Hitti J; Critchlow C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):896-902. PubMed ID: 11641674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Kjelland's forceps in the new millennium. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted rotational forceps delivery.
    Al-Suhel R; Gill S; Robson S; Shadbolt B
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Oct; 49(5):510-4. PubMed ID: 19780735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of obstetric forceps in Finland today--experience at Vaasa Central Hospital 1984-1998.
    Gardberg M; Ahinko-Hakamaa K; Laakkonen E; Kivelä P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Oct; 78(9):803-5. PubMed ID: 10535345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.
    Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W
    East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cohort study of silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: I. Safety of the instrument.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown K; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Oct; 66(4):503-9. PubMed ID: 3900836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Obstetric correlates of neonatal retinal hemorrhage.
    Williams MC; Knuppel RA; O'Brien WF; Weiss A; Spellacy WN; Pietrantoni M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 May; 81(5 ( Pt 1)):688-94. PubMed ID: 8469455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at instrumental vaginal delivery.
    Youssef R; Ramalingam U; Macleod M; Murphy DJ
    BJOG; 2005 Jul; 112(7):941-5. PubMed ID: 15957996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vacuum extraction versus forceps delivery: indications and complications, 1979 to 1984.
    Broekhuizen FF; Washington JM; Johnson F; Hamilton PR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Mar; 69(3 Pt 1):338-42. PubMed ID: 3822282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of a trial of instrumental delivery in theatre on neonatal outcome.
    Olagundoye V; MacKenzie IZ
    BJOG; 2007 May; 114(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 17439569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity.
    Caughey AB; Sandberg PL; Zlatnik MG; Thiet MP; Parer JT; Laros RK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 106(5 Pt 1):908-12. PubMed ID: 16260505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Indications and maternofetal outcome of instrumental deliveries at the University Teaching Hospital of Yaounde, Cameroon.
    Nkwabong E; Nana PN; Mbu R; Takang W; Ekono MR; Kouam L
    Trop Doct; 2011 Jan; 41(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 20940289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.