These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

472 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12174231)

  • 21. Comparison of maternal and fetal effects of vacuum extraction with forceps or cesarean deliveries.
    Greis JB; Bieniarz J; Scommegna A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 May; 57(5):571-7. PubMed ID: 7219906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Operative vaginal deliveries in Zaria, Nigeria.
    Adaji SE; Shittu SO; Sule ST
    Ann Afr Med; 2009; 8(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 19805939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Instrumental rotational delivery in primiparae.
    Gleeson NC; Gormally SM; Morrison JJ; O'Regan M
    Ir Med J; 1992 Dec; 85(4):139-41. PubMed ID: 1473948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with rotational ventouse or second stage caesarean section deliveries.
    Giacchino T; Karkia R; Zhang W; Beta J; Ahmed H; Akolekar R
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Nov; 254():175-180. PubMed ID: 32987337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Outcome of forceps delivery versus vacuum extraction--a review of 200 cases.
    Achanna S; Monga D
    Singapore Med J; 1994 Dec; 35(6):605-8. PubMed ID: 7761886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Decision-to-delivery interval for instrumental vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction versus forceps.
    Lurie S; Glezerman M; Baider C; Sadan O
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Apr; 274(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 16408184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Kielland's forceps or ventouse--a comparison.
    Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Boonrangsimant P
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988 May; 95(5):483-7. PubMed ID: 3401434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes by mode of delivery. A case-controlled study.
    Benedetto C; Marozio L; Prandi G; Roccia A; Blefari S; Fabris C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Nov; 135(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 17126475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neonatal and maternal complications among pregnant women delivered by vacuum extraction or forceps extraction.
    Kovavisarach E; Varanuntakul T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1999 Apr; 82(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 10410490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Maternal morbidity after Thierry's spatulas and vacuum deliveries].
    Menard JP; Provansal M; Heckenroth H; Gamerre M; Bretelle F; Mazouni C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Jun; 36(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 18539070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of different methods of instrumental delivery based on electronic measurements of compression and traction.
    Moolgaoker AS; Ahamed SO; Payne PR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Sep; 54(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 471369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity in midforceps delivery and midpelvis vacuum extraction.
    Baerthlein WC; Moodley S; Stinson SK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Apr; 67(4):594-7. PubMed ID: 3960431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A simple model to predict the complicated operative vaginal deliveries using vacuum or forceps.
    Sainz JA; García-Mejido JA; Aquise A; Borrero C; Bonomi MJ; Fernández-Palacín A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 220(2):193.e1-193.e12. PubMed ID: 30391443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery.
    Macleod M; Strachan B; Bahl R; Howarth L; Goyder K; Van de Venne M; Murphy DJ
    BJOG; 2008 Dec; 115(13):1688-94. PubMed ID: 19035943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Indications and technic of operative vaginal delivery in vertex presentation].
    Gitsch E; Reinold E
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1984; 106(10):653-9. PubMed ID: 6485615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Third degree perineal tears in a university medical center where midline episiotomies are not performed.
    Sheiner E; Levy A; Walfisch A; Hallak M; Mazor M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Apr; 271(4):307-10. PubMed ID: 15024575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Shoulder dystocia related fetal neurological injuries: the predisposing roles of forceps and ventouse extractions.
    Brimacombe M; Iffy L; Apuzzio JJ; Varadi V; Nagy B; Raju V; Portuondo N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 May; 277(5):415-22. PubMed ID: 17906870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Advantages and disadvantages of deliveries after induction of labour by convenience (author's transl)].
    Bolte A; Breuker KH; Haase W; Stille J
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1976 Mar; 36(3):220-37. PubMed ID: 1261788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The mounting rate of cesarean sections. Is it accompanied by a drop in instrumental births?
    Gharaibeh AM; Al-Bdour AE; Akasheh HF
    Saudi Med J; 2008 Feb; 29(2):267-70. PubMed ID: 18246239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries.
    Benavides L; Wu JM; Hundley AF; Ivester TS; Visco AG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1702-6. PubMed ID: 15902181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.