221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12174420)
21. Robot-Assisted Simultaneous Bilateral Radical Inguinal Lymphadenectomy Along with Robotic Bilateral Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: A Feasibility Study.
Ahlawat R; Khera R; Gautam G; Kumar A
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Nov; 26(11):845-849. PubMed ID: 27243665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prospectively packaged ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: the disseminative pattern of lymph node metastasis.
Zhu Y; Zhang SL; Ye DW; Yao XD; Dai B; Zhang HL; Shen YJ; Zhu YP; Shi GH; Ma CG
J Urol; 2009 May; 181(5):2103-8. PubMed ID: 19286211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy: a systematic review.
Gkegkes ID; Minis EE; Iavazzo C
J Robot Surg; 2019 Feb; 13(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 29730734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Differences in Survival Associated with Performance of Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Invasive Penile Cancer: Results from the National Cancer Database.
Correa AF; Handorf E; Joshi SS; Geynisman DM; Kutikov A; Chen DY; Uzzo RG; Viterbo R; Greenberg RE; Smaldone MC
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1238-1244. PubMed ID: 29248557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Controversies on lymphadenectomy in epidermoid carcinoma of the penis].
de Tomás Palacios J
Arch Esp Urol; 1997 Dec; 50(10):1128-9. PubMed ID: 9494207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [The value of biopsy of the inguinal lymph nodes in patients with epidermoid carcinoma of the penis].
Ornellas AA; Correia Seixas AL; Wisnescky A; Campos F; Rangel de Moraes J
Prog Urol; 1995 Sep; 5(4):544-7. PubMed ID: 7581505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Lymph-node metastases in intermediate-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.
Naumann CM; Alkatout I; Al-Najar A; Korda JB; Hegele A; Bolenz C; Ziegler H; Klöppel G; Juenemann KP; van der Horst C
BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(9):1102-6. PubMed ID: 18489528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Treatment of lymph nodes in epidermoid carcinoma of the penis: review of literature by the Committee of Cancerology of the French Association of Urology-External Genital Organs Group (CCAFU-OGE)].
Marconnet L; Bouchot O; Culine S; Avances C; Rigaud J;
Prog Urol; 2010 May; 20(5):332-42. PubMed ID: 20471577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer].
Ornellas AA; Tobias-Machado M
Int Braz J Urol; 2007; 33 Suppl 1():41-54. PubMed ID: 23634487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Long-term followup of penile carcinoma treated with penectomy and bilateral modified inguinal lymphadenectomy.
d'Ancona CA; de Lucena RG; Querne FA; Martins MH; Denardi F; Netto NR
J Urol; 2004 Aug; 172(2):498-501; discussion 501. PubMed ID: 15247713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy: a new minimally invasive procedure for radical management of inguinal nodes in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma.
Tobias-Machado M; Tavares A; Ornellas AA; Molina WR; Juliano RV; Wroclawski ER
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):953-7; discussion 958. PubMed ID: 17296386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Feasibility, complications and oncologic results of a limited inguinal lymph node dissection in the management of penile cancer.
Tsaur I; Biegel C; Gust K; Huesch T; Borgmann H; Brandt MP; Kurosch M; Reiter M; Bartsch G; Schilling D; Haferkamp A
Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(3):486-95. PubMed ID: 26200541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Prevention of complications in inguinal lymphadenectomy].
Bouchot O; Bouchot-Hermouet FB; Karam G; Glemain P; Pannier M; Auvigne J
J Urol (Paris); 1990; 96(5):279-83. PubMed ID: 2230193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Modified technique of radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma: morbidity and outcome.
Yao K; Tu H; Li YH; Qin ZK; Liu ZW; Zhou FJ; Han H
J Urol; 2010 Aug; 184(2):546-52. PubMed ID: 20620415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Contemporary morbidity from lymphadenectomy for penile squamous cell carcinoma: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience.
Bevan-Thomas R; Slaton JW; Pettaway CA
J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1638-42. PubMed ID: 11912379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reduced morbidity by using LigaSure compared to conventional inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in vulvar cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial.
Pouwer AW; Arts HJ; Koopmans CM; IntHout J; Pijnenborg JMA; de Hullu JA
Surg Oncol; 2020 Dec; 35():149-155. PubMed ID: 32877884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Cancer of the penis: the value of systematic biopsy of the superficial inguinal lymph nodes in clinical N0 stage patients].
Bouchot O; Bouvier S; Bochereau G; Jeddi M
Prog Urol; 1993 Apr; 3(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 8508206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The case for inguinal lymph node dissection in the treatment of T2-T4, N0 penile cancer.
Lubke WL; Thompson IM
Semin Urol; 1993 May; 11(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 8362124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: study on the prevention of wound healing complications].
Maurer T; Protzel C; Gschwend JE; Rexer H;
Urologe A; 2014 Apr; 53(4):561-2. PubMed ID: 24700190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Radical open inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma: surgical technique, early complications and late outcomes.
Koifman L; Hampl D; Koifman N; Vides AJ; Ornellas AA
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2086-92. PubMed ID: 23770135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
