These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12174455)
21. A seven year survey of the contact lens prescribing habits of Canadian optometrists. Woods CA; Jones DA; Jones LW; Morgan PB Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jun; 84(6):505-10. PubMed ID: 17568320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses. Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical evaluation of a new multi-purpose disinfecting solution in symptomatic contact lens wearers. Stiegemeier MJ; Friederichs GJ; Hughes JL; Larsen S; Movic W; Potter WB Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2006 Jul; 29(3):143-51. PubMed ID: 16698309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Replacement and care compliance in a planned replacement contact lens program. Phillips LJ; Prevade SL J Am Optom Assoc; 1993 Mar; 64(3):201-5. PubMed ID: 8454838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Improving contact-lens related dryness symptoms with silicone hydrogel lenses. Chalmers R; Long B; Dillehay S; Begley C Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Aug; 85(8):778-84. PubMed ID: 18677242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Contact lenses for the treatment of pediatric cataracts. Ma JJ; Morad Y; Mau E; Brent HP; Barclay R; Levin AV Ophthalmology; 2003 Feb; 110(2):299-305. PubMed ID: 12578770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of use of traditional soft contact lenses and planned replacement lenses]. Kliuvaeva TIu; Reshetnikova MV Vestn Oftalmol; 2005; 121(3):30-2. PubMed ID: 16075628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Randomized trial of the effect of contact lens wear on self-perception in children. Walline JJ; Jones LA; Sinnott L; Chitkara M; Coffey B; Jackson JM; Manny RE; Rah MJ; Prinstein MJ; Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):222-32. PubMed ID: 19214129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Modern scleral lenses part II: patient satisfaction. Visser ES; Visser R; van Lier HJ; Otten HM Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Jan; 33(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 17224675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Long-term clinical results: 3 years of up to 30-night continuous wear of lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel and daily wear of low-Dk/t hydrogel lenses. Bergenske P; Long B; Dillehay S; Barr JT; Donshik P; Secor G; Yoakum J; Chalmers RL Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Mar; 33(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 17496699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The predictability of retention and discontinuation of contact lenses. Jutai J; Day H; Woolrich W; Strong G Optometry; 2003 May; 74(5):299-308. PubMed ID: 12795317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia. Richdale K; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 16699438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Performance of Lotrafilcon B silicone hydrogel contact lenses in experienced low-Dk/t daily lens wearers. Dillehay SM; Miller MB Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Nov; 33(6 Pt 1):272-7. PubMed ID: 17993820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Objective and subjective responses in patients refitted to daily-wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Dumbleton K; Keir N; Moezzi A; Feng Y; Jones L; Fonn D Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 83(10):758-68. PubMed ID: 17041322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Patient satisfaction with large-scale out-of-hours primary health care in The Netherlands: development of a postal questionnaire. Moll van Charante E; Giesen P; Mokkink H; Oort F; Grol R; Klazinga N; Bindels P Fam Pract; 2006 Aug; 23(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 16641129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Initial comfort of lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel contact lenses versus etafilcon A contact lenses for extended wear. Martin R; de Juan V; Rodriguez G; Martin S; Fonseca S Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Mar; 30(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17178252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [The evaluation of surface deposits on frequent replacement lenses by scanning electron microscopy (SEM)]. Kałuzny JJ; Szatkowski J Klin Oczna; 1998; 100(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 9884530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Corneal shape changes induced by first and second generation silicone hydrogel contact lenses in daily wear. Alba-Bueno F; Beltran-Masgoret A; Sanjuan C; Biarnés M; Marín J Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2009 Apr; 32(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 19181564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An evaluation of 1-day disposable contact lens wear in a population of allergy sufferers. Hayes VY; Schnider CM; Veys J Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2003 Jun; 26(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 16303503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]