These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12174712)

  • 1. Prediction of horizontal growth of the nose.
    Steyn CL; du Preez RJ; Harris AM
    SADJ; 2002 May; 57(5):171-3. PubMed ID: 12174712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lip morphological changes in orthodontic treatment. Class II division 1: malocclusion and normal occlusion at rest and on smiling.
    Islam R; Kitahara T; Naher L; Hara A; Nakasima A
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):256-64. PubMed ID: 19216599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Profile modifications induced by orthodontic forces studied by an analysis of the nasolabial angle].
    Chimenti C; Mastromatteo LM; Monaco A; Capogna D
    Minerva Stomatol; 1994 Dec; 43(12):585-90. PubMed ID: 7739493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The accuracy of video imaging for mixed dentition and adolescent treatment.
    Hoss K; Sameshima GT; Grubb JE; Sinclair PM
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(5):355-64. PubMed ID: 9347109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Soft-tissue changes during facial growth in skeletal Class II individuals.
    Hoffelder LB; de Lima EM; Martinelli FL; Bolognese AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4):490-5. PubMed ID: 17418715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Soft tissue changes produced by a banded-type Herbst appliance in late mixed dentition patients.
    de Almeida MR; Flores-Mir C; Brandão AG; de Almeida RR; de Almeida-Pedrin RR
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 18575306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Labial retrusion].
    Négrier B; Bourriau G
    Orthod Fr; 1997; 68(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 9432631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facial profile changes with various orthodontic premolar extraction sequences during growth.
    Steyn CL; Maritz JS; du Preez RJ; Harris AM
    SADJ; 2004 May; 59(4):139-41, 143-5. PubMed ID: 15279088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A nonradiographic approach to detect Class III skeletal discrepancies.
    Staudt CB; Kiliaridis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19577148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and testing of multilevel models for longitudinal craniofacial growth prediction.
    Chvatal BA; Behrents RG; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jul; 128(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 16027625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facial morphology of Finnish children with and without developmental hip dysplasia using 3D facial templates.
    Hanis SB; Kau CH; Souccar NM; English JD; Pirttiniemi P; Valkama M; Harila V
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2010 Nov; 13(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 21040466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adolescent growth changes in soft tissue profile.
    Prahl-Andersen B; Ligthelm-Bakker AS; Wattel E; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 May; 107(5):476-83. PubMed ID: 7733056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semilongitudinal cephalometric study of craniofacial growth in untreated Class III malocclusion.
    Alexander AE; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):700.e1-14; discussion 700-1. PubMed ID: 19524825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nasiolabial angle: evaluation methods and diagnosis.
    Martel D
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2006; 17(4):38-9. PubMed ID: 17256443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Results of cephalometric-anthropometric measurements of the nasal profile of patients with ClassII/1 anomalies].
    Sterzik G; Wortha HP; Sterzik M
    Dtsch Stomatol (1990); 1991; 41(5):170-3. PubMed ID: 1816823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Behavior of the labial seal in Class II/1, II/2].
    Colangelo G; Malagola C; Luzi V
    Mondo Ortod; 1982; 7(4):15-9. PubMed ID: 6960250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Asymmetry of the lips of orthognathic surgery patients.
    Yamashita Y; Nakamura Y; Shimada T; Nomura Y; Hirashita A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 19815159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.
    Isik F; Nalbantgil D; Sayinsu K; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16431898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.