333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12174952)
1. Value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of suspected ovarian masses.
Huber S; Medl M; Baumann L; Czembirek H
Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(4):2501-7. PubMed ID: 12174952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of suspected ovarian masses.
Medl M; Kulenkampff KJ; Stiskal M; Peters-Engl C; Leodolter S; Czembirek H
Anticancer Res; 1995; 15(3):1123-5. PubMed ID: 7645935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Classification of asymptomatic adnexal masses by ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography.
Grab D; Flock F; Stöhr I; Nüssle K; Rieber A; Fenchel S; Brambs HJ; Reske SN; Kreienberg R
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Jun; 77(3):454-9. PubMed ID: 10831359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ovarian cancer: detection and radiologic staging.
Shaaban A; Rezvani M
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 52(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 19179862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of combination of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography for evaluation of ovarian masses.
Tsuboyama T; Tatsumi M; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Sakane M; Hori Y; Morii E; Hatazawa J; Tomiyama N
Invest Radiol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):524-31. PubMed ID: 24637584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Imaging strategy for early ovarian cancer: characterization of adnexal masses with conventional and advanced imaging techniques.
Mohaghegh P; Rockall AG
Radiographics; 2012 Oct; 32(6):1751-73. PubMed ID: 23065168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sonographic morphological pattern in the pre-operative prediction of ovarian masses.
Benjapibal M; Sunsaneevitayakul P; Phatihattakorn C; Suphanit I; Iamurairat W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Apr; 86(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 12757077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Asymptomatic adnexal masses: correlation of FDG PET and histopathologic findings.
Fenchel S; Grab D; Nuessle K; Kotzerke J; Rieber A; Kreienberg R; Brambs HJ; Reske SN
Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):780-8. PubMed ID: 12034950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI, CT, and PET/CT for ovarian cancer detection and adnexal lesion characterization.
Iyer VR; Lee SI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):311-21. PubMed ID: 20093590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors with MR imaging: comparison with transvaginal sonography, positron emission tomography, and histologic findings.
Rieber A; Nüssle K; Stöhr I; Grab D; Fenchel S; Kreienberg R; Reske SN; Brambs HJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Jul; 177(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 11418411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasonography and computed tomography for management of adnexal masses in Iranian patients with suspected ovarian cancer: results of a prospective study.
Behtash N; Rahmani M; Ghotbizadeh F; Karimi Zarchi M; Mousavi A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2009; 10(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 19537883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Computerized tomography and MR tomography in diagnosis of ovarian tumors].
Hamm B
Radiologe; 1994 Jul; 34(7):362-9. PubMed ID: 7938483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ovarian cancer: the clinical role of US, CT, and MRI.
Togashi K
Eur Radiol; 2003 Dec; 13 Suppl 4():L87-104. PubMed ID: 15018172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease.
Salem S; White LM; Lai J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differentiation between malignant and benign ovarian tumors by magnetic resonance imaging.
Chen M; Wang WC; Zhou C; Zhou NN; Cai K; Yang ZH; Zhao WF; Li SY; Li GZ
Chin Med Sci J; 2006 Dec; 21(4):270-5. PubMed ID: 17249204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnosis and staging of ovarian cancer: comparative values of Doppler and conventional US, CT, and MR imaging correlated with surgery and histopathologic analysis--report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group.
Kurtz AB; Tsimikas JV; Tempany CM; Hamper UM; Arger PH; Bree RL; Wechsler RJ; Francis IR; Kuhlman JE; Siegelman ES; Mitchell DG; Silverman SG; Brown DL; Sheth S; Coleman BG; Ellis JH; Kurman RJ; Caudry DJ; McNeil BJ
Radiology; 1999 Jul; 212(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 10405715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation of ultrasound features and the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm score for different histopathological subtypes of benign adnexal masses.
Ionescu CA; Matei A; Navolan D; Dimitriu M; Bohâltea R; Neacsu A; Ilinca C; Ples L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Aug; 97(31):e11762. PubMed ID: 30075600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Imaging techniques for the evaluation of ovarian cancer.
Fischerova D; Burgetova A
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Jul; 28(5):697-720. PubMed ID: 24846098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A critical evaluation of transvaginal Doppler studies, transvaginal sonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and CA 125 in detecting ovarian cancer.
Hata K; Hata T; Manabe A; Sugimura K; Kitao M
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 80(6):922-6. PubMed ID: 1448260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The ovary. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Occhipinti KA; Frankel SD; Hricak H
Radiol Clin North Am; 1993 Sep; 31(5):1115-32. PubMed ID: 8362057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
