These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The importance of an expansion chamber during standard and tandem extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Fernández F; Fernández G; Loske AM J Endourol; 2009 Apr; 23(4):693-7. PubMed ID: 19335160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The efficacy of a range of contact media as coupling agents in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Cartledge JJ; Cross WR; Lloyd SN; Joyce AD BJU Int; 2001 Sep; 88(4):321-4. PubMed ID: 11564013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Management of Proximal Ureteric Stones: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) Versus Ureterorenoscopic Lithotripsy (URSL). Joshi HN; Shrestha B; Karmacharya RM; Makaju S; Koju R; Gyawali D Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2017 Oct.-Dec.; 15(60):343-346. PubMed ID: 30580354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of the safety profile of treatment with a large number of shock waves per session in extracorporeal lithotripsy. Budía Alba A; López Acón JD; Polo-Rodrigo A; Bahílo-Mateu P; Trassierra-Villa M; Boronat-Tormo F Actas Urol Esp; 2015 Jun; 39(5):291-5. PubMed ID: 25582924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of an experimental electrohydraulic discharge device for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: Pressure field of sparker array. Li G; Connors BA; Schaefer RB; Gallagher JJ; Evan AP J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov; 142(5):3147. PubMed ID: 29195423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of treatment strategy on stone comminution efficiency in shock wave lithotripsy. Zhou Y; Cocks FH; Preminger GM; Zhong P J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):349-54. PubMed ID: 15201809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The principle of extracorporeal shock wave lithotriptor and its locating system]. Yin J; Zhong ZL Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2002 Mar; 26(2):124-6, 123. PubMed ID: 16104177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of synchronous twin pulse technique for shock wave lithotripsy: determination of optimal parameters for in vitro stone fragmentation. Sheir KZ; Zabihi N; Lee D; Teichman JM; Rehman J; Sundaram CP; Heimbach D; Hesse A; Delvecchio F; Zhong P; Preminger GM; Clayman RV J Urol; 2003 Dec; 170(6 Pt 1):2190-4. PubMed ID: 14634376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What makes a shock wave efficient in lithotripsy? Granz B; Köhler G J Stone Dis; 1992 Apr; 4(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 10149177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimentally validated multiphysics computational model of focusing and shock wave formation in an electromagnetic lithotripter. Fovargue DE; Mitran S; Smith NB; Sankin GN; Simmons WN; Zhong P J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1598-609. PubMed ID: 23927200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shifting the Split Reflectors to Enhance Stone Fragmentation of Shock Wave Lithotripsy. Wang JC; Zhou Y Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1876-89. PubMed ID: 27166016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Physical-technical principles of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT)]. Gerdesmeyer L; Maier M; Haake M; Schmitz C Orthopade; 2002 Jul; 31(7):610-7. PubMed ID: 12219657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of energy density and acoustic cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy. Loske AM Ultrasonics; 2010 Feb; 50(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 19819511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]