These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12175788)

  • 1. Logical implications of applying the principles of population genetics to the interpretation of DNA profiling evidence.
    Triggs CM; Buckleton JS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2002 Aug; 128(3):108-14. PubMed ID: 12175788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Population genetics in the forensic DNA debate.
    Weir BS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1992 Dec; 89(24):11654-9. PubMed ID: 1465380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lies, damned lies, and DNA statistics: DNA match testing Bayes' Theorem, and the criminal courts.
    Jowett C
    Med Sci Law; 2001 Jul; 41(3):194-205. PubMed ID: 11506343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How reliable is the sub-population model in DNA testimony?
    Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Walsh SJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Mar; 157(2-3):144-8. PubMed ID: 15921869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DNA forensic science 1995.
    Morton NE
    Eur J Hum Genet; 1995; 3(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 7552142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DNA evidence, probabilistic evaluation and collaborative tests.
    Taroni F; Aitken CG
    Forensic Sci Int; 2000 Feb; 108(2):121-43. PubMed ID: 10722199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subjective interpretation, laboratory error and the value of forensic DNA evidence: three case studies.
    Thompson WC
    Genetica; 1995; 96(1-2):153-68. PubMed ID: 7607453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions: Part I: evaluation of DNA profiling comparisons given (sub-) source propositions.
    Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():189-202. PubMed ID: 30041098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical and genetic aspects of quality control for DNA identification.
    Morton NE; Collins AE
    Electrophoresis; 1995 Sep; 16(9):1670-7. PubMed ID: 8582354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. God's signature: DNA profiling, the new gold standard in forensic science.
    Lynch M
    Endeavour; 2003 Jun; 27(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 12798816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of DNA match probability in criminal case.
    Lee JW; Lee HS; Park M; Hwang JJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2001 Feb; 116(2-3):139-48. PubMed ID: 11182265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What is the magnitude of the subpopulation effect?
    Curran JM; Buckleton JS; Triggs CM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2003 Jul; 135(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12893129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lab Retriever: a software tool for calculating likelihood ratios incorporating a probability of drop-out for forensic DNA profiles.
    Inman K; Rudin N; Cheng K; Robinson C; Kirschner A; Inman-Semerau L; Lohmueller KE
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 16():298. PubMed ID: 26384762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forensic population genetics and the National Research Council (NRC).
    Weir BS
    Am J Hum Genet; 1993 Feb; 52(2):437-40. PubMed ID: 8430704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions. Part II: Evaluation of biological traces considering activity level propositions.
    Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102186. PubMed ID: 31677444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The logical foundations of forensic science: towards reliable knowledge.
    Evett I
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 370(1674):. PubMed ID: 26101288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comments on the statistical aspects of the NRC's report on DNA typing.
    Devlin B; Risch N; Roeder K
    J Forensic Sci; 1994 Jan; 39(1):28-40. PubMed ID: 8113709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
    Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):516-28. PubMed ID: 23948322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The forensic debut of the NRC's DNA report: population structure, ceiling frequencies and the need for numbers.
    Kaye DH
    Genetica; 1995; 96(1-2):99-105. PubMed ID: 7607463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence evaluation: a response to the court of appeal judgment in R v T.
    Berger CE; Buckleton J; Champod C; Evett IW; Jackson G
    Sci Justice; 2011 Jun; 51(2):43-9. PubMed ID: 21605824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.