120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12175963)
1. The use of DNA statistics in criminal trials.
Henderson JP
Forensic Sci Int; 2002 Aug; 128(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 12175963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DNA fingerprinting on trial: the dramatic early history of a new forensic technique.
Aronson JD
Endeavour; 2005 Sep; 29(3):126-31. PubMed ID: 16087235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The prosecutor's fallacy--a pitfall in interpreting probabilities in forensic evidence.
Leung WC
Med Sci Law; 2002 Jan; 42(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 11848139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. God's signature: DNA profiling, the new gold standard in forensic science.
Lynch M
Endeavour; 2003 Jun; 27(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 12798816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Challenges to the admissibility of DNA profiling evidence in criminal trials.
Roberts H
Aust Fam Physician; 1993 Apr; 22(4):507-11. PubMed ID: 8481114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. DNA, not d.o.a.
Nat Genet; 1999 Mar; 21(3):243-4. PubMed ID: 10080165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Manufacturing convictions: why defendants are entitled to the data underlying forensic DNA kits.
Mellon JN
Duke Law J; 2001 Dec; 51(3):1097-137. PubMed ID: 11944660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Lies, damned lies, and DNA statistics: DNA match testing Bayes' Theorem, and the criminal courts.
Jowett C
Med Sci Law; 2001 Jul; 41(3):194-205. PubMed ID: 11506343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of forensic DNA evidence in prosecutors'offices.
Prottas JM; Noble AA
J Law Med Ethics; 2007; 35(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 17518857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Post-conviction DNA testing: the UK's first 'exoneration' case?
Johnson P; Williams R
Sci Justice; 2004; 44(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 15112595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Allowing new technology to erode constitutional protections: a Fourth Amendment challenge to non-consensual DNA testing of prisoners.
Love SH
Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(5):1617-60. PubMed ID: 11653232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. DNA fingerprinting reconsidered (again).
Beardsley T
Sci Am; 1992 Jul; 267(1):26. PubMed ID: 1502508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Forensic DNA data banks: considerations for the health sector.
Lakra R; Dimitriadis F
Health Law Can; 2002 Feb; 22(3):57-70. PubMed ID: 11915589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of the gunshot residue expert in case review - A case study.
Shaw A
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jul; 300():28-31. PubMed ID: 31075564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The promise and perils of criminal DNA databanking.
Kimmelman J
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Jul; 18(7):695-6. PubMed ID: 10888794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. U.S. panel seeking restriction on use of DNA in courts.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, C7. PubMed ID: 11646944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cuomo seeks genetic data of offenders.
Raab S
N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():27, 34. PubMed ID: 11646946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic matches and the logic of the law.
Curran JM; Robertson B; Vignaux GA
Genetica; 1999; 105(2):211-3. PubMed ID: 10568262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic witness: forensic uses of DNA tests.
Nishimi RY; O'Connor KW; Gwin HL; Anderson MA
J Int Bioethique; 1991; 2(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 11651050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Juries and crime labs: correcting the weak links in the DNA chain.
McDonald R
Am J Law Med; 1998; 24(2-3):345-63. PubMed ID: 9702277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
