237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12176099)
1. Examination of a vehicle for use with water soluble materials in the murine local lymph node assay.
Ryan CA; Cruse LW; Skinner RA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Gerberick GF
Food Chem Toxicol; 2002 Nov; 40(11):1719-25. PubMed ID: 12176099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interlaboratory validation of 1% pluronic l92 surfactant as a suitable, aqueous vehicle for testing pesticide formulations using the murine local lymph node assay.
Boverhof DR; Wiescinski CM; Botham P; Lees D; Debruyne E; Repetto-Larsay M; Ladics G; Hoban D; Gamer A; Remmele M; Wang-Fan W; Ullmann LG; Mehta J; Billington R; Woolhiser MR
Toxicol Sci; 2008 Sep; 105(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 18556666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of irritants on lymph node cell proliferation and the detection of contact sensitivity to metal salts in the murine local lymph node assay.
Ikarashi Y; Tsukamoto Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Sep; 29(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 8222623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of vehicle on assessment of relative skin sensitization potency of 1,4-dihydroquinone in the local lymph node assay.
Lea LJ; Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA
Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 10594297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of strain differences and vehicles on results of local lymph node assays.
Anzai T; Ullmann LG; Hayashi D; Satoh T; Kumazawa T; Sato K
Exp Anim; 2010; 59(2):245-9. PubMed ID: 20484859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of vehicle on the relative potency of skin-sensitizing chemicals in the local lymph node assay.
Jowsey IR; Clapp CJ; Safford B; Gibbons BT; Basketter DA
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2008; 27(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 18568891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of application vehicle on skin sensitization to methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone: an analysis using the local lymph node assay.
Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Basketter DA; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Dec; 41(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 10617213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of relative skin sensitizing potency using the local lymph node assay: a comparison of formaldehyde with glutaraldehyde.
Hilton J; Dearman RJ; Harvey P; Evans P; Basketter DA; Kimber I
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Mar; 9(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 9471984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human potency predictions for aldehydes using the local lymph node assay.
Basketter DA; Wright ZM; Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; White IR
Contact Dermatitis; 2001 Aug; 45(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 11553118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals.
Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Methods; 2007 Jan; 41(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 16938465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of BALB/c mouse in the local lymph node assay:BrdU-ELISA for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals.
Hou F; Xing C; Li B; Cheng J; Chen W; Zhang M
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2015; 72():53-8. PubMed ID: 25600862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cytokine endpoints for the local lymph node assay: consideration of interferon-gamma and interleukin 12.
Dearman RJ; Hilton J; Basketter DA; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 1999; 19(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 10362264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment.
Kimber I; Basketter DA; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Steiling W; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C
Toxicol Sci; 2001 Feb; 59(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 11158712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of LLNA:DAE: a new local lymph node assay that includes the elicitation phase, discriminates borderline-positive chemicals, and is useful for cross-sensitization testing.
Yamashita K; Shinoda S; Hagiwara S; Itagaki H
J Toxicol Sci; 2014 Feb; 39(1):147-61. PubMed ID: 24418719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data.
Gerberick GF; Robinson MK; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA; Wright Z; Marks JG
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Sep; 12(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 11526521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vehicle effects on skin sensitizing potency of four chemicals: assessment using the local lymph node assay.
Wright ZM; Basketter PA; Blaikie L; Cooper KJ; Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2001 Apr; 23(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 18498452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictive identification of human skin sensitization thresholds.
Basketter DA; Clapp C; Jefferies D; Safford B; Ryan CA; Gerberick F; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Nov; 53(5):260-7. PubMed ID: 16283904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of the sensitization potential of persulfate salts used for bleaching hair.
Cruz MJ; De Vooght V; Muñoz X; Hoet PH; Morell F; Nemery B; Vanoirbeek JA
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Feb; 60(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 19207378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of the skin sensitization potential of topical medicaments using the local lymph node assay: an interlaboratory evaluation.
Kimber I; Hilton J; Dearman RJ; Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Basketter DA; Lea L; House RV; Ladics GS; Loveless SE; Hastings KL
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 1998 Apr; 53(7):563-79. PubMed ID: 9561969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Local lymph node assay responses to paraphenylenediamine: intra- and inter-laboratory evaluations.
Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Lea LJ; Basketter DA; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 1999; 19(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 10439339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
