These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12177653)

  • 1. Quantification of valvular aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Friedrich MG; Schulz-Menger J; Poetsch T; Pilz B; Uhlich F; Dietz R
    Am Heart J; 2002 Aug; 144(2):329-34. PubMed ID: 12177653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Planimetry of orifice area in aortic stenosis using multiplane transesophageal echocardiography.
    Hoffmann R; Flachskampf FA; Hanrath P
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Aug; 22(2):529-34. PubMed ID: 8335825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Valve orifice area in aortic stenosis evaluated by planimetry, Gorlin and continuity equations: a prospective study.
    João I; Cotrim C; Duarte JA; Fazendas P; Catarino C; Pereira H; Matias F; de Oliveira LM; Carrageta M
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2002 Apr; 21(4):421-34. PubMed ID: 12090128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography for assessment of aortic valve area in aortic valve stenosis.
    Malyar NM; Schlosser T; Buck T; Erbel R
    Herz; 2006 Oct; 31(7):650-7. PubMed ID: 17072778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Planimetry of the Orifice Area in Aortic Valve Stenosis Using Phase-Contrast Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Abe H; Iguchi N; Utanohara Y; Takada K; Hen Y; Machida H; Takeda N; Sumiyoshi T
    Int Heart J; 2018 Jan; 59(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 29279525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemodynamic assessment of severe aortic stenosis: MRI evaluation of dynamic changes of vena contracta.
    Weininger M; Sagmeister F; Herrmann S; Lange V; Schoepf UJ; Beissert M; Voelker W; Koestler H; Hahn D; Weidemann F; Beer M
    Invest Radiol; 2011 Jan; 46(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 21102347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hakki's formula for measurement of aortic valve area by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Puymirat E; Chassaing S; Trinquart L; Barbey C; Chaudeurge A; Bar O; Blanchard D
    Am J Cardiol; 2010 Jul; 106(2):249-54. PubMed ID: 20599011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Planimetry of mitral valve stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Djavidani B; Debl K; Lenhart M; Seitz J; Paetzel C; Schmid FX; Nitz WR; Feuerbach S; Riegger G; Luchner A
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jun; 45(12):2048-53. PubMed ID: 15963408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Absolute assessment of aortic valve stenosis by planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and cardiac catheterisation.
    Reant P; Lederlin M; Lafitte S; Serri K; Montaudon M; Corneloup O; Roudaut R; Laurent F
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Aug; 59(2):276-83. PubMed ID: 16873006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Planimetry of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Debl K; Djavidani B; Seitz J; Nitz W; Schmid FX; Muders F; Buchner S; Feuerbach S; Riegger G; Luchner A
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Oct; 40(10):631-6. PubMed ID: 16189431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A New Method for Aortic Valve Planimetry with High-Resolution 3-Dimensional MRI and Its Comparison with Conventional Cine MRI and Echocardiography for Assessing the Severity of Aortic Valvular Stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Choe YH; Kim SM; Kim EK; Lee M; Park SJ; Ahn J; Carriere KC
    Korean J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 22(8):1266-1278. PubMed ID: 33938648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography in the assessment of stenotic aortic valve area: a comparative study.
    Dimitriou P; Kähäri A; Emilsson K; Thunberg P
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Nov; 53(9):995-1003. PubMed ID: 22983258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques.
    Kupfahl C; Honold M; Meinhardt G; Vogelsberg H; Wagner A; Mahrholdt H; Sechtem U
    Heart; 2004 Aug; 90(8):893-901. PubMed ID: 15253962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional surface area of the aortic valve orifice by three-dimensional echocardiography: clinical validation of a novel index for assessment of aortic stenosis.
    Ge S; Warner JG; Abraham TP; Kon ND; Brooker RF; Nomeir AM; Fowle KM; Burgess P; Kitzman DW
    Am Heart J; 1998 Dec; 136(6):1042-50. PubMed ID: 9842018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography.
    Caruthers SD; Lin SJ; Brown P; Watkins MP; Williams TA; Lehr KA; Wickline SA
    Circulation; 2003 Nov; 108(18):2236-43. PubMed ID: 14568899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.
    Burwash IG; Dickinson A; Teskey RJ; Tam JW; Chan KL
    Can J Cardiol; 2000 Aug; 16(8):985-92. PubMed ID: 10978934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Planimetry of the aortic valve orifice area: comparison of multislice spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Westermann Y; Geigenmüller A; Elgeti T; Wagner M; Dushe S; Borges AC; Dohmen PM; Hein PA; Lembcke A
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):426-35. PubMed ID: 19783394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation of aortic valve area obtained by the velocity-encoded phase contrast continuity method to direct planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Tanaka K; Makaryus AN; Wolff SD
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 17891618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Precision of forty slice spiral computed tomography for quantifying aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography and validation against cardiac catheterization.
    Lembcke A; Thiele H; Lachnitt A; Enzweiler CN; Wagner M; Hein PA; Eddicks S; Kivelitz DE
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Oct; 43(10):719-28. PubMed ID: 18791414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Planimetry of aortic valve area using multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography is not a reliable method for assessing severity of aortic stenosis.
    Bernard Y; Meneveau N; Vuillemenot A; Magnin D; Anguenot T; Schiele F; Bassand JP
    Heart; 1997 Jul; 78(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 9290405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.