594 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12178876)
1. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals.
Benshoof J
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bare court majority reaffirms Roe, but standard for reviewing state laws is relaxed.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Jul; (11):1-3. PubMed ID: 12286280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Roe v. Wade. Jane's perspective.
Kaplan L
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):27-8. PubMed ID: 12178883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. U.S. abortion policy since Roe v. Wade.
Mcfarlane DR
Am J Gynecol Health; 1993; 7(4):98-106. PubMed ID: 12288251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion and the law: the Supreme Court, privacy, and abortion.
Marsh FH
Adv Bioeth; 1997; 2():107-23. PubMed ID: 12348324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anti-abortion movement.
Wilson K
Plan Parent Rev; 1985; 5(2):4-6. PubMed ID: 12340405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
Denniston L
Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
Benshoof J
Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Roe v. Wade and "partial birth abortion" bans.
Reprod Freedom News; 1998 Jan; 7(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 12293726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproductive rights in jeopardy. The Supreme Court upholds restrictions on abortion.
Gleeson K
ZPG Report; 1992 Sep; 24(4):7. PubMed ID: 12317715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Roe v. Wade. Wayward women.
Petchesky R; Joffe C
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):33-4. PubMed ID: 12178888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sex, lies, and stereotypes.
Benshoof J
Reprod Freedom News; 1998 Jan; 7(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 12293725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
Martin PA
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High court hears clinic blockade case, as appeals court upholds abortion law.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 Oct; (17):2-3. PubMed ID: 12284473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion foes get turn to ask Supreme Court for constitutional protection.
Denniston L
Sun; 1994 Apr; ():10A. PubMed ID: 12287661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues.
Bryant MD
Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What the U.S. Constitution says. The law and abortion.
Liben P
Freedom Rev; 1995; 26(5):20-1. PubMed ID: 12346849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The international impact of Roe v. Wade.
Brueggemann I
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):19. PubMed ID: 12178878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FOCA, funding on center stage to test new dynamic in abortion politics.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Jan; (1):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
