595 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12178876)
21. For women, abortion can't be the whole story.
Beck J
Sun; 1992 Apr; ():13A. PubMed ID: 12343688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Ethical issues in U.S. family planning policy.
Benshoof J
Draper Fund Rep; 1983 Aug; (12):11-2. PubMed ID: 12338973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Roe v. Wade, the next twenty-five years.
Kissling F
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):2-3. PubMed ID: 12178879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Roe v. Wade. On abortion.
French M
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):21. PubMed ID: 12178880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Abortion in America: 12 years after Roe v. Wade.
Popul Today; 1985 Nov; 13(11):2, 8-9. PubMed ID: 12267463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
Brown HO
Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Partial-birth abortion, Congress, and the Constitution.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 1998 Jul; 339(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9673308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Roe v. Wade. En la lucha.
Montanez W
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):30. PubMed ID: 12178885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Abortion: a history.
Hovey G
Plan Parent Rev; 1985; 5(2):18-21. PubMed ID: 12340403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Court reaffirms Roe but upholds restrictions.
Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(4):174-7, 185. PubMed ID: 1526274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A sour note on Roe vs. Wade.
Roth JA
Res Sociol Health Care; 1991; 9():3-8. PubMed ID: 12317574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Roe v. Wade. Canada's example.
Morgentaler H
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):31. PubMed ID: 12178886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Legal aspects of abortion practice.
Goldman EB
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 3709009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinton repeals antiabortion policies as activists map out new strategies.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Feb; (3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. 25 years after Roe: new technological parameters for an old debate.
Cohen SA
Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1998 Feb; 1(1):5, 12. PubMed ID: 12321448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Roe v. Wade. My prochoice journey.
Kennedy KR
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):28. PubMed ID: 12178916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A caravan for women's lives.
Bader EJ
Integration; 1990 Apr; (23):38-9. PubMed ID: 12316327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Roe v. Wade. Dismantling patriarchy.
Walker R
Conscience; 1998; 18(4):39. PubMed ID: 12178918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Religious freedom and family life: reflections on the right to choose.
Paltrow LM
Conscience; 1985; 6(6):1, 3, 12. PubMed ID: 12178932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
Haas-Wilson D
J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
