These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12178918)

  • 21. Roe v. Wade. Into the next millennium.
    Sanger AC
    Conscience; 1998; 18(4):36-7. PubMed ID: 12178889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Legislating family relationships.
    Gleeson K
    ZPG Report; 1991 Sep; 23(4):7. PubMed ID: 12284469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Roe v. Wade. Matters sexual.
    Brickner B
    Conscience; 1998; 18(4):18-9. PubMed ID: 12178915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. More family planning and abortion services needed.
    Gold R
    Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 3(4):5. PubMed ID: 12267090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Roe v. Wade. Earth's inhabitants.
    Gudorf CE
    Conscience; 1998; 18(4):25. PubMed ID: 12178881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinton repeals antiabortion policies as activists map out new strategies.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Feb; (3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ethical issues in U.S. family planning policy.
    Benshoof J
    Draper Fund Rep; 1983 Aug; (12):11-2. PubMed ID: 12338973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How Roe v. Wade has shaped my life and work.
    Hern WM
    Conscience; 1998; 18(4):26. PubMed ID: 12178882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Roe v. Wade, the next twenty-five years.
    Kissling F
    Conscience; 1998; 18(4):2-3. PubMed ID: 12178879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Roe v. Wade. Reflective compassion.
    Padovano AT
    Conscience; 1998; 18(4):32-3. PubMed ID: 12178887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Roe v. Wade and "partial birth abortion" bans.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1998 Jan; 7(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 12293726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Who makes the abortion decision?: law, practice, and the limits of the liberal solution.
    Lamanna MA
    Res Sociol Health Care; 1991; 9():9-20. PubMed ID: 12317577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. What happens to contraception when anti-abortion laws pass?
    Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Sep; 12(9):143-4. PubMed ID: 12317311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
    Denniston L
    Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Roe v. Wade. Ardently prochoice.
    Baldwin M
    Conscience; 1998; 18(4):15-6. PubMed ID: 12178875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Roe v. Wade. Catholic wisdom.
    Maguire D
    Conscience; 1998; 18(4):29. PubMed ID: 12178884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. From the world beyond Washington. The states and fertility-related laws: an analysis at mid-year.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1987 Aug; ():4-6. PubMed ID: 12281329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. New abortion laws introduce informed and parental consent.
    Family Plan World; 1991; 1(2):25. PubMed ID: 12284517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Abortion foes get turn to ask Supreme Court for constitutional protection.
    Denniston L
    Sun; 1994 Apr; ():10A. PubMed ID: 12287661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Induced abortion: an historical overview.
    Mcfarlane DR
    Am J Gynecol Health; 1993; 7(3):77-82. PubMed ID: 12345979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.