735 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12179687)
1. Abortion-related issues in the U.S. foreign assistance program.
Mchugh JT
Int Rev; 1988; 12(4):330-9. PubMed ID: 12179687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The attempt to break down overseas population assistance: Population Crisis Committee.
Camp SL
Interaction; 1986 Jan; 6(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 12340678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exporting abortion politics: the battle over international family planning assistance.
Lasher C
Conscience; 1991; 12(5):22-3. PubMed ID: 12178849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Grant recipients' rights in question.
Willson PD
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 4(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 12266274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AID renews ties with IPPF as major foreign aid policy changes are seen. But UNFPA funds being temporarily withheld.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Dec; (19):1-2. PubMed ID: 12345356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. USA President Clinton acts to ensure reproductive health.
IPPF Open File; 1993 Feb; ():1. PubMed ID: 12286731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study cites unmet world demand for contraceptives.. House panel votes to increase Pop Aid funding, rescind program restrictions.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 May; (8):1-2. PubMed ID: 12316871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anti-abortion policy leads to more abortions.
Jacobson JL
World Watch; 1988; 1(3):9-10. PubMed ID: 12342329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. AID to restore support to pop groups shunned under Reagan and Bush.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Aug; (13):3, 4. PubMed ID: 12318257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Veto -- or threat thereof -- prevails over majority as 102nd Congress adjourns.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Oct; (15):2-4. PubMed ID: 12317790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. House vote on Hyde changes dynamic of Congressional abortion debate.
Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Jul; (12):1-2. PubMed ID: 12286695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Funding for international family planning attacked.
Kaeser L
Contracept Technol Update; 1997 Aug; 18(8):101-3. PubMed ID: 12292727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Population conference: consensus and conflict.
Willson PD
Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 4(2):24, 27. PubMed ID: 12339890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. House okays $330 million for population.
Popline; 1992; 14():1-2. PubMed ID: 12317620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Domestic, international family planning programs at risk.
Turnbull W; Kaeser L
Guttmacher Rep Public Policy; 1998 Feb; 1(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12321447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Public Law 100-202, Joint Resolution making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1988, and for other purposes, 22 December 1987.
United States
Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():215. PubMed ID: 12289429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The state of world population and its implications for the US.
Fornos W
JOICFP News; 1987 Jul; (157):4-5, 7. PubMed ID: 12341830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Family planning saves lives, prevents abortion.
Shane B
Popul Today; 1997 Mar; 25(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12347774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New rules on family planning: a good compromise, or a dangerous precedent?
Schlitt C
Monday Dev; 2000 Jan; 18(2):7. PubMed ID: 12349537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Election '94: a population overview.
Dixon B
ZPG Report; 1994; 26(5):1-2. PubMed ID: 12345670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
