These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1218115)

  • 41. Variations in the effects of electric stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on cat single auditory-nerve-fiber responses to tone bursts.
    Wiederhold ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1970 Oct; 48(4):966-77. PubMed ID: 5480391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The olivocochlear efferent bundle and susceptibility of the inner ear to acoustic injury.
    Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1991 Jan; 65(1):123-32. PubMed ID: 1999726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Antimasking effect of crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation with loud clicks in guinea pig.
    Nieder P; Nieder I
    Exp Neurol; 1970 Jul; 28(1):179-88. PubMed ID: 5433660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Crossed olivocochlear bundle: electrical stimulation enhances masked neural responses to loud clicks.
    Nieder PC; Nieder I
    Brain Res; 1970 Jun; 21(1):135-7. PubMed ID: 5433108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The transient electric responses of the cochlea.
    Stopp PE
    J Physiol; 1969 Nov; 205(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 5357242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Effects of increasing perilymph calcium levels on various cochlear potentials].
    Hu L; Dong W; Chen J
    Zhongguo Ying Yong Sheng Li Xue Za Zhi; 1997 May; 13(2):128-30. PubMed ID: 10074232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Inhibition of release of acetylcholine by strychnine and its implications regarding transmission by the olivo-cochlear bundle.
    McKinstry DN; Koelle GB
    Nature; 1967 Feb; 213(5075):505-6. PubMed ID: 6032233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Sources of averaged neural responses recorded in animal and human subjects during cochlear audiometry (electro-cochleogram).
    Lev A; Sohmer H
    Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1972; 201(2):79-90. PubMed ID: 5051284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Effect of neomycinsulfate of efferent compound action potentials of the n. cochlearis of the guinea pig (author's transl)].
    Zöllner C
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1974; 208(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 4480405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of the electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on cochlear potentials recorded with intracochlear electrodes in guinea pigs.
    Konishi T; Slepian JZ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1971 Jun; 49(6):1762-9. PubMed ID: 5125722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Olivocochlear bundle activity recorded in awake cats.
    Banks WF; Saunders JC; Lowry LD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1979); 1979; 87(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 503507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Some characteristics of the "auditory neurophonic".
    Weinberger NM; Kitzes LM; Goodman DA
    Experientia; 1970 Jan; 26(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 5412293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Masked cochlear whole-nerve response intensity functions altered by electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle.
    Dolan DF; Nuttall AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Mar; 83(3):1081-6. PubMed ID: 3356813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. THE EFFECT OF CONTRALATERAL OLIVO-COCHLEAR BUNDLE STIMULATION ON THE COCHLEAR POTENTIALS EVOKED BY ACOUSTIC STIMULI OF VARIOUS FREQUENCIES AND INTENSITIES.
    SOHMER H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1965; 60():59-70. PubMed ID: 14337958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Auditory nerve fiber activity influenced by contralateral ear sound stimulation.
    Buño W
    Exp Neurol; 1978 Mar; 59(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 627269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A block model of the cat cochlear nucleus.
    Kiang NY; Godfrey DA; Norris BE; Moxon SE
    J Comp Neurol; 1975 Jul; 162(2):221-45. PubMed ID: 1150920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Suppressive effect and its frequency selection of dopamine on the cochlear auditory afferent nerve activity in guinea pigs].
    Hou ZQ; Yu LS; Li XQ; Liu J
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 43(8):601-5. PubMed ID: 18959265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Tetanus toxin blocks the efferent endings in the cochlea.
    Klinke R; Galley N; Pause M; Storch WH
    Brain Res; 1973 Jan; 49(2):447-50. PubMed ID: 4352732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of asphyxia and aminooxyacetic acid on the slow potential evoked by crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation.
    Bobbin RP; Bledsoe SC; Chihal DM
    Hear Res; 1981 Nov; 5(2-3):265-9. PubMed ID: 7309641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Compound action potential of the cochlear nerve evoked electrically. Electrophysiological study of the acoustic nerve (guinea pig).
    Nagel D
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1974; 206(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 4479079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.