These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12181618)
1. Does osteoporosis classification using heel BMD agree across manufacturers? Grigorian M; Shepherd JA; Cheng XG; Njeh CF; Toschke JO; Genant HK Osteoporos Int; 2002 Aug; 13(8):613-7. PubMed ID: 12181618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A list of device-specific thresholds for the clinical interpretation of peripheral x-ray absorptiometry examinations. Blake GM; Chinn DJ; Steel SA; Patel R; Panayiotou E; Thorpe J; Fordham JN; Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):2149-56. PubMed ID: 16228104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [X-ray densitometry and ultrasonography of the heel bone--sensitivity and comparison with densitometry of the axial skeleton]. Michalská D; Zikán V; Stĕpán J; Weichetová M; Kubová V; Krenková J; Masatová A Cas Lek Cesk; 2000 Apr; 139(8):231-6. PubMed ID: 10916211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Heel bone densitometry: device specific thresholds for the assessment of osteoporosis. McCauley E; Mackie A; Elliott D; Chuck A Br J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 79(942):464-7. PubMed ID: 16714746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recalculation of the NHANES database SD improves T-score agreement and reduces osteoporosis prevalence. Binkley N; Kiebzak GM; Lewiecki EM; Krueger D; Gangnon RE; Miller PD; Shepherd JA; Drezner MK J Bone Miner Res; 2005 Feb; 20(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 15647812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry. El-Desouki MI; Sherafzal MS; Othman SA Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two methods for measuring ultrasound properties of the heel in postmenopausal women. Ingle BM; Sherwood KE; Eastell R Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(6):500-5. PubMed ID: 11446567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The usefulness of dual energy X-ray and laser absorptiometry of the calcaneus versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of hip and spine in diagnosing manifest osteoporosis. de Klerk G; van der Velde D; van der Palen J; van Bergeijk L; Hegeman JH Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Feb; 129(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 18825395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results. Genant HK; Grampp S; Glüer CC; Faulkner KG; Jergas M; Engelke K; Hagiwara S; Van Kuijk C J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Oct; 9(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 7817795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Towards standardization of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the forearm: a common region of interest (ROI) improves the comparability among DXA devices. Prevrhal S; Lu Y; Genant HK; Toschke JO; Shepherd JA Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 May; 76(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 15868279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification. Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound? Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 10928222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dual energy x-ray laser measurement of calcaneal bone mineral density. Hakulinen MA; Saarakkala S; Töyräs J; Kröger H; Jurvelin JS Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jun; 48(12):1741-52. PubMed ID: 12870580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reference data and predictive diagnostic models for calcaneus bone mineral density measured with single-energy X-ray absorptiometry in 7428 Chinese. Xu SZ; Zhou W; Mao XD; Xu J; Xu LP; Ren JY Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(9):755-62. PubMed ID: 11605742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of rates of bone loss from the spine measured using two manufacturers' densitometers. Peel NF; Eastell R J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Nov; 10(11):1796-801. PubMed ID: 8592958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standardization of spine and hip BMD measurements in different DXA devices. Ozdemir A; Uçar M Eur J Radiol; 2007 Jun; 62(3):423-6. PubMed ID: 17289322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is discordance in bone measurements affected by body composition or anthropometry? A comparative study between peripheral and central devices. Saarelainen J; Rikkonen T; Honkanen R; Kröger H; Tuppurainen M; Niskanen L; Jurvelin JS J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 17451985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone mineral density measured by a portable X-ray device agrees with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at forearm in preschool aged children. Hazell TJ; Vanstone CA; Rodd CJ; Rauch F; Weiler HA J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(3):302-307. PubMed ID: 22898084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone mineral density of the spine and femur in healthy Moroccan women. El Maghraoui A; Guerboub AA; Achemlal L; Mounach A; Nouijai A; Ghazi M; Bezza A; Tazi MA J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(4):454-60. PubMed ID: 17097532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of a Swedish T-score reference population for women causes a two-fold increase in the amount of postmenopausal Swedish patients that fulfill the WHO criteria for osteoporosis. Ribom EL; Ljunggren O; Mallmin H J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(3):404-11. PubMed ID: 18280191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]