347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12182289)
1. Influence of the microgap in the peri-implant hard and soft tissues: a histomorphometric study in dogs.
Todescan FF; Pustiglioni FE; Imbronito AV; Albrektsson T; Gioso M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):467-72. PubMed ID: 12182289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible.
Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Schenk RK; Buser D; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1372-83. PubMed ID: 11699479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of a new implant abutment design on peri-implant soft tissues.
Chien HH; Schroering RL; Prasad HS; Tatakis DN
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Oct; 40(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 23339331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The biologic width around titanium implants: histometric analysis of the implantogingival junction around immediately and early loaded implants.
Bakaeen L; Quinlan P; Schoolfield J; Lang NP; Cochran DL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Jun; 29(3):297-305. PubMed ID: 19537469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible.
Hermann JS; Buser D; Schenk RK; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2000 Sep; 71(9):1412-24. PubMed ID: 11022770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of microgap location and configuration on the periimplant bone morphology in submerged implants. An experimental study in dogs.
Weng D; Nagata MJ; Bell M; Bosco AF; de Melo LG; Richter EJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1141-7. PubMed ID: 18983317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of thick mucosa on peri-implant tissues: an experimental study in dogs.
Jeong SM; Choi BH; Li J; Xuan F
J Periodontol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):2151-5. PubMed ID: 18980524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The mucosal barrier at implant abutments of different materials.
Welander M; Abrahamsson I; Berglundh T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jul; 19(7):635-41. PubMed ID: 18492075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in peri-implant tissues subjected to orthodontic forces and ligature breakdown in monkeys.
Hürzeler MB; Quiñones CR; Kohal RJ; Rohde M; Strub JR; Teuscher U; Caffesse RG
J Periodontol; 1998 Mar; 69(3):396-404. PubMed ID: 9579628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog.
Botticelli D; Berglundh T; Persson LG; Lindhe J
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 15842258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "Biologic width"and crestal bone remodeling with sintered porous-surfaced dental implants: a study in dogs.
Deporter D; Al-Sayyed A; Pilliar RM; Valiquette N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 18700381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Submerged or non-submerged healing of endosseous implants to be used in the rehabilitation of partially dentate patients.
Cecchinato D; Olsson C; Lindhe J
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 31(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 15016259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of transmucosal designs of three one-piece implant systems on early tissue responses: a histometric study in beagle dogs.
Kim S; Oh KC; Han DH; Heo SJ; Ryu IC; Kwon JH; Han CH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):309-14. PubMed ID: 20369089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Soft tissue reactions to non-submerged unloaded titanium implants in beagle dogs.
Buser D; Weber HP; Donath K; Fiorellini JP; Paquette DW; Williams RC
J Periodontol; 1992 Mar; 63(3):225-35. PubMed ID: 1593416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Soft and hard tissue histologic dimensions around dental implants in the canine restored with smaller-diameter abutments: a paradigm shift in peri-implant biology.
Cochran DL; Mau LP; Higginbottom FL; Wilson TG; Bosshardt DD; Schoolfield J; Jones AA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):494-502. PubMed ID: 23527352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Crestal bone changes at nonsubmerged implants (Camlog) with different machined collar lengths: a histomorphometric pilot study in dogs.
Schwarz F; Herten M; Bieling K; Becker J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):335-42. PubMed ID: 18548932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biological width following immediate implant placement in the dog: flap vs. flapless surgery.
Blanco J; Alves CC; Nuñez V; Aracil L; Muñoz F; Ramos I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jun; 21(6):624-31. PubMed ID: 20666789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone response to loaded implants with non-matching implant-abutment diameters in the canine mandible.
Cochran DL; Bosshardt DD; Grize L; Higginbottom FL; Jones AA; Jung RE; Wieland M; Dard M
J Periodontol; 2009 Apr; 80(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 19335081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible.
King GN; Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Buser D; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1111-7. PubMed ID: 12416767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histometric and ultrastructural studies of tissues surrounding Astra dental implants in dogs.
Arvidson K; Bystedt H; Ericsson I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 2133337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
