419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1218357)
1. Film and xeroradiographic images in mammography. A comparison of tungsten and molybdenum anode materials.
Evans AL; James WB; McLellan J; Davison M
Br J Radiol; 1975 Dec; 48(576):968-72. PubMed ID: 1218357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Film-screen mammography x-ray tube anodes: molybdenum versus tungsten.
Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Rothschild P
Med Phys; 1989; 16(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 2716707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Image quality in film and xero-mammography. I. Rendering of low contrast values (author's transl)].
Säbel M; Paterok EM; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F
Rofo; 1977 Jun; 126(6):529-36. PubMed ID: 142714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tungsten anode tubes with K-edge filters for mammography.
Beaman S; Lillicrap SC; Price JL
Br J Radiol; 1983 Oct; 56(670):721-7. PubMed ID: 6616137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient exposures from film and xeroradiographic mammographic techniques.
Rothenberg LN; Kirch RL; Snyder RE
Radiology; 1975 Dec; 117(3 Pt 1):701-3. PubMed ID: 1188121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast calcification and mass detection with mammographic anode-filter combinations of molybdenum, tungsten, and rhodium.
Kimme-Smith CM; Sayre JW; McCombs MM; DeBruhl ND; Bassett LW
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):679-83. PubMed ID: 9169688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Image quality in film and xero mammography. Second paper. Reproduction of medium range contrast (author's transl)].
Willgeroth F; Paterok EM; Säbel M; Weishaar J
Rofo; 1980 Apr; 132(4):433-7. PubMed ID: 6450105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of anode/filter combinations in digital mammography with respect to the average glandular dose.
Uhlenbrock DF; Mertelmeier T
Rofo; 2009 Mar; 181(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 19241602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of anode-filter combinations on image quality and radiation dose in 965 women undergoing mammography.
Thilander-Klang AC; Ackerholm PH; Berlin IC; Bjurstam NG; Mattsson SL; Månsson LG; von Schéele C; Thunberg SJ
Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):348-54. PubMed ID: 9114087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A comparison of various mammographic techniques using freshly amputated breasts (author's transl)].
Paterok EM; Säbel M; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F
Rofo; 1978 Jul; 129(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 149719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A comparison of the radiation dose from film and xeroradiography (author's transl)].
Evers R; Römer M
Rofo; 1975 Jul; 123(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 130303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of a "sandwich" technique to control image geometry in clinical studies comparing intraoral xeroradiographs and E-speed films.
Ludlow JB; Hill RA; Hayes CJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 May; 65(5):618-25. PubMed ID: 3163790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Xeroradiography and ionography: new technologies to replace the x-ray film.
Allan FV; Reiss KH
Med Prog Technol; 1976 Apr; 3(4):143-8. PubMed ID: 934037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Xero and film mammography: two images with one exposure.
Wyatt CC
Radiol Technol; 1980; 51(5):621-5. PubMed ID: 7384431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Letter: Image quality and radiation in mammography.
Evans AL; James WB; McLellan J; Davison M
Br J Radiol; 1975 Dec; 48(576):1035-6. PubMed ID: 1218344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Studies on image quality in mammography using a tungsten anode tube in conjunction with edge filters].
Minski M; Säbel M; Aichinger H; Joite-Barfuss S
Rofo; 1988 Apr; 148(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 2834793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose comparisons for mammographic systems.
Speiser RC; Zanrosso EM; Jeromin LS; Carlson RA
Med Phys; 1986; 13(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 3784994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microfocal spot magnification mammography using xeroradiographic and screen-film recording systems.
Sickles EA
Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 441362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
