These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1218357)
1. Film and xeroradiographic images in mammography. A comparison of tungsten and molybdenum anode materials. Evans AL; James WB; McLellan J; Davison M Br J Radiol; 1975 Dec; 48(576):968-72. PubMed ID: 1218357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector]. Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Film-screen mammography x-ray tube anodes: molybdenum versus tungsten. Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Rothschild P Med Phys; 1989; 16(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 2716707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Image quality in film and xero-mammography. I. Rendering of low contrast values (author's transl)]. Säbel M; Paterok EM; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F Rofo; 1977 Jun; 126(6):529-36. PubMed ID: 142714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient exposures from film and xeroradiographic mammographic techniques. Rothenberg LN; Kirch RL; Snyder RE Radiology; 1975 Dec; 117(3 Pt 1):701-3. PubMed ID: 1188121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast calcification and mass detection with mammographic anode-filter combinations of molybdenum, tungsten, and rhodium. Kimme-Smith CM; Sayre JW; McCombs MM; DeBruhl ND; Bassett LW Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):679-83. PubMed ID: 9169688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Image quality in film and xero mammography. Second paper. Reproduction of medium range contrast (author's transl)]. Willgeroth F; Paterok EM; Säbel M; Weishaar J Rofo; 1980 Apr; 132(4):433-7. PubMed ID: 6450105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of anode/filter combinations in digital mammography with respect to the average glandular dose. Uhlenbrock DF; Mertelmeier T Rofo; 2009 Mar; 181(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 19241602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of anode-filter combinations on image quality and radiation dose in 965 women undergoing mammography. Thilander-Klang AC; Ackerholm PH; Berlin IC; Bjurstam NG; Mattsson SL; Månsson LG; von Schéele C; Thunberg SJ Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):348-54. PubMed ID: 9114087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A comparison of various mammographic techniques using freshly amputated breasts (author's transl)]. Paterok EM; Säbel M; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F Rofo; 1978 Jul; 129(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 149719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography]. Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A comparison of the radiation dose from film and xeroradiography (author's transl)]. Evers R; Römer M Rofo; 1975 Jul; 123(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 130303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of a "sandwich" technique to control image geometry in clinical studies comparing intraoral xeroradiographs and E-speed films. Ludlow JB; Hill RA; Hayes CJ Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 May; 65(5):618-25. PubMed ID: 3163790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Xeroradiography and ionography: new technologies to replace the x-ray film. Allan FV; Reiss KH Med Prog Technol; 1976 Apr; 3(4):143-8. PubMed ID: 934037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Xero and film mammography: two images with one exposure. Wyatt CC Radiol Technol; 1980; 51(5):621-5. PubMed ID: 7384431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Letter: Image quality and radiation in mammography. Evans AL; James WB; McLellan J; Davison M Br J Radiol; 1975 Dec; 48(576):1035-6. PubMed ID: 1218344 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Studies on image quality in mammography using a tungsten anode tube in conjunction with edge filters]. Minski M; Säbel M; Aichinger H; Joite-Barfuss S Rofo; 1988 Apr; 148(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 2834793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose comparisons for mammographic systems. Speiser RC; Zanrosso EM; Jeromin LS; Carlson RA Med Phys; 1986; 13(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 3784994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microfocal spot magnification mammography using xeroradiographic and screen-film recording systems. Sickles EA Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 441362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]