These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1218357)

  • 21. Soft tissue xeroradiography of the shoulder joint.
    Reichmann S; Astrand K; Deichgräber E; Olsson B
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1975 Nov; 16(6):572-6. PubMed ID: 1217522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Breast xeroradiography (author's transl)].
    Gros CM; Prévot G
    J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1975; 56(6-7):471-80. PubMed ID: 1177191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mammograms obtained with rhodium vs molybdenum anodes: contrast and dose differences.
    Kimme-Smith C; Wang J; DeBruhl N; Basic M; Bassett LW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jun; 162(6):1313-7. PubMed ID: 8191989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Magnification mammography: evaluation of screen-film and xeroradiographic techniques.
    Haus AG; Paulus DD; Dodd GD; Cowart RW; Bencomo J
    Radiology; 1979 Oct; 133(1):223-6. PubMed ID: 472295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Clinical advantage of xeroradiography in the diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Takahashi I; Suzuki K
    Gan No Rinsho; 1985 May; Suppl():83-95. PubMed ID: 4068235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Absorbed dose in mammography using three tungsten and three molybdenum target tubes.
    Palmer RC; Egan RL; Tanner BK; Barnette PA
    Radiology; 1971 Dec; 101(3):697-9. PubMed ID: 5129114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Xeroradiography--an in-depth review.
    Paulus DD
    CRC Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1980; 12(4):309-84. PubMed ID: 6988168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of x-ray spectra and outputs from molybdenum and tungsten targets.
    Marshall M; Peaple LH; Ardran GM; Crooks HE
    Br J Radiol; 1975 Jan; 48(565):31-9. PubMed ID: 1109625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of anode and filter material on image quality and glandular dose for screen-film mammography.
    Desponds L; Depeursinge C; Grecescu M; Hessler C; Samiri A; Valley JF
    Phys Med Biol; 1991 Sep; 36(9):1165-82. PubMed ID: 1946601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Patient radiation dose in conventional and xerographic cephalography.
    Copley RL; Glaze SA; Bushong SC; West DC
    Am J Orthod; 1979 Nov; 76(5):505-10. PubMed ID: 292313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dose reduction in xeroradiography of the breast.
    Van De Riet W; Wolfe JN
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1977 May; 128(5):821-3. PubMed ID: 404909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of x-ray spectra from molybdenum and tungsten target tubes on image quality in mammography.
    Haus AG; Metz CE; Chiles JT; Rossmann K
    Radiology; 1976 Mar; 118(3):705-9. PubMed ID: 1251024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Optimization of radiation dose and image quality in mammography: a clinical evaluation of rhodium versus molybdenum.
    Monticciolo DL; Sprawls P; Kruse BD; Peterson JE
    South Med J; 1996 Apr; 89(4):391-4. PubMed ID: 8614878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Electrostatic recording of x-ray images].
    Biehl H
    Med Tekh; 1983; (2):56-9. PubMed ID: 6855518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Absorbed dose in xeromammography.
    Zárand P; Péntek Z
    Br J Radiol; 1980 Feb; 53(626):114-9. PubMed ID: 7370491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimization of tube potential-filter combinations for film-screen mammography: a contrast detail phantom study.
    Chida K; Zuguchi M; Sai M; Saito H; Yamada T; Ishibashi T; Ito D; Kimoto N; Kohzuki M; Takahashi S
    Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 15967314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Optimization of xeroradiographic exposures.
    Jaeger SS; Cacak RK; Barnes JE; Hendee WR
    Radiology; 1978 Jul; 128(1):217-22. PubMed ID: 663213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of xeroradiographic image quality.
    Zeman GH; Rao GU; Osterman FA
    Radiology; 1976 Jun; 119(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 935409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Dose reduction in xeromammography (author's transl)].
    John V; Ewen K; Kurz E
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1978 May; 103(20):859-61. PubMed ID: 648366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sensitometric characteristics of dental xeroradiography.
    Gratt BM; Sickles EA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Nov; 56(5):555-9. PubMed ID: 6580602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.