These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12184555)

  • 1. Limitations in advance task preparation: switching the relevant stimulus dimension in speeded same-different comparisons.
    Meiran N; Marciano H
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jun; 30(4):540-50. PubMed ID: 12184555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological correlates of preparation and implementation for different types of task shifts.
    Hsieh S; Wu M
    Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 1423():41-52. PubMed ID: 22000079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural correlates of response-effector switching using event-related potentials.
    Hsieh S; Wu M; Lin F
    Biol Psychol; 2014 Dec; 103():332-48. PubMed ID: 25448134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intentional attention switching in dichotic listening: exploring the efficiency of nonspatial and spatial selection.
    Lawo V; Fels J; Oberem J; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):2010-24. PubMed ID: 25248101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selective attention to perceptual dimensions and switching between dimensions.
    Meiran N; Dimov E; Ganel T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):191-201. PubMed ID: 22409145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The dual implication of dual affordance: stimulus-task binding and attentional focus changing during task preparation.
    Meiran N
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(4):251-9. PubMed ID: 18683622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age differences in switching the relevant stimulus dimensions in a speeded same-different judgment paradigm.
    Hsieh S; Wu M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Oct; 135(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 20598271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preparation for horizontal or vertical dimensions affects the right-left prevalence effect.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Oct; 69(7):1242-52. PubMed ID: 18038960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Object-based selection within and beyond the focus of spatial attention.
    Law MB; Abrams RA
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Oct; 64(7):1017-27. PubMed ID: 12489658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural mechanisms of advance preparation in task switching.
    Gruber O; Karch S; Schlueter EK; Falkai P; Goschke T
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jun; 31(2):887-95. PubMed ID: 16490365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shifting the set of stimulus selection when switching between tasks.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):134-145. PubMed ID: 28752317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probing the Neural Systems Underlying Flexible Dimensional Attention.
    Buss AT; Magnotta V; Hazeltine E; Kinder K; Spencer JP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2021 Jun; 33(7):1365-1380. PubMed ID: 34496401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Component processes in task switching.
    Meiran N; Chorev Z; Sapir A
    Cogn Psychol; 2000 Nov; 41(3):211-53. PubMed ID: 11032657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intentional switching of auditory attention between long and short sequential tone patterns.
    Nolden S; Koch I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1132-1146. PubMed ID: 28205053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tasks of a feather flock together: similarity effects in task switching.
    Arrington CM; Altmann EM; Carr TH
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Jul; 31(5):781-9. PubMed ID: 12956242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advance preparation in task switching: what work is being done?
    Altmann EM
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Sep; 15(9):616-22. PubMed ID: 15327633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. More attention to attention? An eye-tracking investigation of selection of perceptual attributes during a task switch.
    Longman CS; Lavric A; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1142-51. PubMed ID: 23088543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):955-965. PubMed ID: 29642783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Components of attentional set-switching.
    Rushworth MF; Passingham RE; Nobre AC
    Exp Psychol; 2005; 52(2):83-98. PubMed ID: 15850156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.