These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12184561)

  • 21. The spacing effect in intentional and incidental free recall by children and adults: Limits on the automaticity hypothesis.
    Toppino TC; Fearnow-Kenney MD; Kiepert MH; Teremula AC
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Apr; 37(3):316-25. PubMed ID: 19246346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Spacing of repetitions improves learning and memory after moderate and severe TBI.
    Hillary FG; Schultheis MT; Challis BH; Millis SR; Carnevale GJ; Galshi T; DeLuca J
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Feb; 25(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 12607171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of selective attention and a stimulus prefix on the output order of immediate free recall of short and long lists.
    Grenfell-Essam R; Ward G
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2015 Mar; 69(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 25730637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The lag effect and differential organization theory: nine failures to replicate.
    Toppino TC; Gracen TF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1985 Jan; 11(1):185-91. PubMed ID: 3156950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perceptual processing in dichotic listening.
    Massaro DW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1975 May; 2(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 1225941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Examining the lag effect under incidental encoding: contributions of semantic priming and reminding.
    Bui DC; Maddox GB; Zou F; Hale SS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2134-48. PubMed ID: 24749628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Revising current two-process accounts of spacing effects in memory.
    Russo R; Parkin AJ; Taylor SR; Wilks J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Jan; 24(1):161-72. PubMed ID: 9438957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effects of repetition spacing on the illusory truth effect.
    Udry J; White SK; Barber SJ
    Cognition; 2022 Aug; 225():105157. PubMed ID: 35533415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Semantic relations and repetition of items enhance the free recall of words by multiple sclerosis patients.
    Andrade VM; Oliveira MG; Miranda MC; Oliveira AS; Oliveira EM; Bueno OF
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Dec; 25(8):1070-8. PubMed ID: 14566581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The spacing effect depends on an encoding deficit, retrieval, and time in working memory: evidence from once-presented words.
    Braun K; Rubin DC
    Memory; 1998 Jan; 6(1):37-65. PubMed ID: 9640432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Immediate free recall of drug names: effects of similarity and availability.
    Lambert BL; Chang KY; Lin SJ
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2003 Jan; 60(2):156-68. PubMed ID: 12561660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Neural mechanisms of the spacing effect in episodic memory: A parallel EEG and fMRI study.
    Zhao X; Wang C; Liu Q; Xiao X; Jiang T; Chen C; Xue G
    Cortex; 2015 Aug; 69():76-92. PubMed ID: 25989444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Beginning at the beginning: Recall order and the number of words to be recalled.
    Tan L; Ward G; Paulauskaite L; Markou M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1282-92. PubMed ID: 26844583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Encoding and retrieval in schizophrenics' free recall.
    McClain L
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 1983 Aug; 171(8):471-9. PubMed ID: 6875531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Marijuana and memory impairment: the effect of retrieval cues on free recall.
    Miller L; Cornett T; Brightwell D; McFarland D; Drew WG; Wikler A
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1976 Dec; 5(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 1023232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Recall accuracy and illusory memories: when more is less.
    Toglia MP; Neuschatz JS; Goodwin KA
    Memory; 1999 Mar; 7(2):233-56. PubMed ID: 10645381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. When will bigger be (recalled) better? The influence of category size on JOLs depends on test format.
    Hourihan KL; Tullis JG
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):910-21. PubMed ID: 25758175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A computational model of prefrontal control in free recall: strategic memory use in the California Verbal Learning Task.
    Becker S; Lim J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):821-32. PubMed ID: 14511535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modeling list-strength and spacing effects using version 3 of the retrieving effectively from memory (REM.3) model and its superimposition-of-similar-images assumption.
    Ensor TM; Surprenant AM; Neath I
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Feb; 53(1):4-21. PubMed ID: 31898291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Encoding, maintenance, and retrieval processes in the lag effect: a multinomial processing tree analysis.
    Küpper-Tetzel CE; Erdfelder E
    Memory; 2012; 20(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 22171809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.