These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12184561)

  • 41. Examining the relationship between immediate serial recall and immediate free recall: common effects of phonological loop variables but only limited evidence for the phonological loop.
    Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1110-41. PubMed ID: 24564540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Spacing effects on implicit picture memory.
    Kitao N
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Apr; 86(2):396-8. PubMed ID: 9638739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Effects of repetitions in overt rehearsal on free recall].
    Isarida T; Isarida T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1994 Oct; 65(4):278-85. PubMed ID: 7861683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition.
    Glenberg AM
    Mem Cognit; 1979 Mar; 7(2):95-112. PubMed ID: 459836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Retrieval-induced forgetting and part-list cuing in associatively structured lists.
    Bäuml KH; Kuhbandner C
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Dec; 31(8):1188-97. PubMed ID: 15058680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The curious case of orthographic distinctiveness: Disruption of categorical processing.
    McDaniel MA; Cahill MJ; Bugg JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 26237617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Expanded vs. equal interval spaced retrieval practice: exploring different schedules of spacing and retention interval in younger and older adults.
    Logan JM; Balota DA
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2008 May; 15(3):257-80. PubMed ID: 18421627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Do students think that difficult or valuable materials should be restudied sooner rather than later?
    Cohen MS; Yan VX; Halamish V; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1682-96. PubMed ID: 23565792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evidence for impaired mnemonic strategy use among patients with schizophrenia using the part-list cuing paradigm.
    Christensen BK; Girard TA; Benjamin AS; Vidailhet P
    Schizophr Res; 2006 Jul; 85(1-3):1-11. PubMed ID: 16632330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Adaptive memory: Animacy enhances free recall but impairs cued recall.
    Popp EY; Serra MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Feb; 42(2):186-201. PubMed ID: 26375781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: the effects of list length and output order.
    Ward G; Tan L; Grenfell-Essam R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1207-41. PubMed ID: 20804293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The effect of the length of to-be-remembered lists and intervening lists on free recall: a reexamination using overt rehearsal.
    Ward G; Tan L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Nov; 30(6):1196-210. PubMed ID: 15521798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Semantic and contextual cuing of preschool children's recall.
    Perlmutter M; Sophian C; Mitchell DB; Cavanaugh JC
    Child Dev; 1981 Sep; 52(3):873-81. PubMed ID: 7285659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Can intentional forgetting reduce false memory? Effects of list-level and item-level forgetting.
    Lee YS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 17475195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Focusing the search: proactive and retroactive interference and the dynamics of free recall.
    Unsworth N; Brewer GA; Spillers GJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1742-56. PubMed ID: 23855548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Adults' word recall and word repetition.
    Kynette D; Kemper S; Norman S; Cheung HT
    Exp Aging Res; 1990; 16(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 2090462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall.
    Farrell S; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):838-49. PubMed ID: 14516217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Associative asymmetry in probed recall of serial lists.
    Kahana MJ; Caplan JB
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Sep; 30(6):841-9. PubMed ID: 12450088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Age, presentation rate, and the effectiveness of structural and semantic recall cues.
    Rankin JL; Hinrichs JV
    J Gerontol; 1983 Sep; 38(5):593-6. PubMed ID: 6886316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The animacy advantage for free-recall performance is not attributable to greater mental arousal.
    Popp EY; Serra MJ
    Memory; 2018 Jan; 26(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 28504562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.