These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12185865)

  • 21. Auditory performance of cochlear implant children aged 2-5 years.
    Thawin C; Kanchanalarp C; Lertsukprasert K; Cheewaruangroj W; Khantapasuantara K; Ruencharoen S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Nov; 89(11):1923-7. PubMed ID: 17205875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Neuropsychological testing in the screening for cochlear implant candidacy.
    Kutz W; Wright C; Krull KR; Manolidis S
    Laryngoscope; 2003 Apr; 113(4):763-6. PubMed ID: 12671445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Central auditory development in children with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Bauer PW; Sharma A; Martin K; Dorman M
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Oct; 132(10):1133-6. PubMed ID: 17043265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech perception by students with cochlear implants using sound-field systems in classrooms.
    Iglehart F
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 15248805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cochlear implants in elderly people: preliminary results.
    Sterkers O; Mosnier I; Ambert-Dahan E; Herelle-Dupuy E; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Bouccara D
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2004 May; (552):64-7. PubMed ID: 15219050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perception of suprasegmental features of speech by children with cochlear implants and children with hearing AIDS.
    Most T; Peled M
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2007; 12(3):350-61. PubMed ID: 17478417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. BKB-SIN and ANL predict perceived communication ability in cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Chisolm TH; Blasco GP; Shinnick LJ; Ketter KJ; Krause JC
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 19390441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A test of static and dynamic balance function in children with cochlear implants: the vestibular olympics.
    Cushing SL; Chia R; James AL; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Jan; 134(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 18209133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. 12-month post-operative results for older children using sequential bilateral implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC; Briggs RJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):19S-21S. PubMed ID: 17496639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of a novel, noninvasive, objective test of auditory nerve function in cochlear implant candidates.
    Gräbel S; Hirschfelder A; Scheiber C; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 19704358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography in pre-operative evaluation of cochlear implant candidates with congenital hearing loss.
    Sennaroglu L; Saatci I; Aralasmak A; Gursel B; Turan E
    J Laryngol Otol; 2002 Oct; 116(10):804-10. PubMed ID: 12437835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of cochlear implant electrode deactivation on speech perception and in predicting device failure.
    Zeitler DM; Lalwani AK; Roland JT; Habib MG; Gudis D; Waltzman SB
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 18833018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cochlear implants, acquisitions and controversies in the adult patient.
    Corvera G; Fraysse B
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1991; 112(4):313-7. PubMed ID: 1775754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perceived qualitative benefits of cochlear implants in children with multi-handicaps.
    Wiley S; Jahnke M; Meinzen-Derr J; Choo D
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 69(6):791-8. PubMed ID: 15885331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs): an audiometric evaluation.
    Priwin C; Stenfelt S; Granström G; Tjellström A; Håkansson B
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 14709999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Measurement of hearing aid outcome in the elderly: comparison between young and old elderly.
    Chang WH; Tseng HC; Chao TK; Hsu CJ; Liu TC
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Jun; 138(6):730-4. PubMed ID: 18503844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Pathophysiological study of severe hearing disorders in children and the countermeasures].
    Arao H
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2002 Feb; 105(2):188-91. PubMed ID: 11922042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.