These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12186049)

  • 41. Assessment of the dynamics of vocal fold contact from the electroglottogram: data from normal male subjects.
    Orlikoff RF
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Oct; 34(5):1066-72. PubMed ID: 1749236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Vowel effect on glottal parameters and the magnitude of jaw opening.
    Lim M; Lin E; Bones P
    J Voice; 2006 Mar; 20(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 15941648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparisons among aerodynamic, electroglottographic, and acoustic spectral measures of female voice.
    Holmberg EB; Hillman RE; Perkell JS; Guiod PC; Goldman SL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 38(6):1212-23. PubMed ID: 8747815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Modeling the effects of a posterior glottal opening on vocal fold dynamics with implications for vocal hyperfunction.
    Zañartu M; Galindo GE; Erath BD; Peterson SD; Wodicka GR; Hillman RE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3262. PubMed ID: 25480072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of glottal dynamics in the production of shouted speech.
    Mittal VK; Yegnanarayana B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3050-61. PubMed ID: 23654408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Voice Source Variation Between Vowels in Male Opera Singers.
    Sundberg J; Lã FM; Gill BP
    J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):509-17. PubMed ID: 26350698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effect of air flow and medial adductory compression on vocal efficiency and glottal vibration.
    Berke GS; Hanson DG; Gerratt BR; Trapp TK; Macagba C; Natividad M
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1990 Mar; 102(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 2108407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Acoustic analysis of trill sounds.
    Dhananjaya N; Yegnanarayana B; Bhaskararao P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):3141-52. PubMed ID: 22501086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Vocal intensity in falsetto phonation of a countertenor: an analysis by synthesis approach.
    Tom K; Titze IR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1667-76. PubMed ID: 11572375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Experimental evaluation of inverse filtering using physical systems with known glottal flow and tract characteristics.
    Chu DT; Li K; Epps J; Smith J; Wolfe J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL358-62. PubMed ID: 23656094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Analyzing neoglottal vibration of Cantonese tracheoesophageal speech: preliminary aerodynamic study using inverse filtering.
    Ng ML; Chan MW
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2012; 64(6):283-9. PubMed ID: 23429237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evidence of the significance of secondary excitations of the vocal tract for vocal intensity.
    Alku P; Vintturi J; Vilkman E
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2001; 53(4):185-97. PubMed ID: 11385278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The effect of resonance tubes on glottal contact quotient with and without task instruction: a comparison of trained and untrained voices.
    Gaskill CS; Quinney DM
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):e79-93. PubMed ID: 21550779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Classification of vocal aging using parameters extracted from the glottal signal.
    Forero Mendoza LA; Cataldo E; Vellasco MM; Silva MA; Apolinário JA
    J Voice; 2014 Sep; 28(5):532-7. PubMed ID: 24880675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Glottal area and vibratory patterns studied with simultaneous stroboscopy, flow glottography, and electroglottography.
    Hertegård S; Gauffin J
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Feb; 38(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 7731222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Estimation of impact stress using an aeroelastic model of voice production.
    Horácek J; Laukkanen AM; Sidlof P
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2007; 32(4):185-92. PubMed ID: 17990190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effect of an artificially lengthened vocal tract on estimated glottal contact quotient in untrained male voices.
    Gaskill CS; Erickson ML
    J Voice; 2010 Jan; 24(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 19135851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Flow Glottogram and Subglottal Pressure Relationship in Singers and Untrained Voices.
    Sundberg J
    J Voice; 2018 Jan; 32(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 28495328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Electroglottographic contact quotient in different phonation types using different amplitude threshold levels.
    Kankare E; Laukkanen AM; Ilomäki I; Miettinen A; Pylkkänen T
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2012 Oct; 37(3):127-32. PubMed ID: 22432606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Peak-to-peak glottal flow amplitude as a function of F(0).
    Laukkanen AM; Sundberg J
    J Voice; 2008 Nov; 22(6):614-21. PubMed ID: 17509822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.