These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12186049)

  • 61. Contact Quotient of Female Singers Singing Four Pitches for Five Vowels in Normal and Pressed Phonations.
    Ong Tan KG
    J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):645.e15-645.e22. PubMed ID: 28554825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Spectral correlates of glottal voice source waveform characteristics.
    Gauffin J; Sundberg J
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Sep; 32(3):556-65. PubMed ID: 2779199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. On pressure-frequency relations in the excised larynx.
    Alipour F; Scherer RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2296-305. PubMed ID: 17902865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Determination of glottal open regions by exploiting changes in the vocal tract system characteristics.
    Prasad RS; Yegnanarayana B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):666. PubMed ID: 27475188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Acoustic and EGG analyses of emotional utterances.
    Waaramaa T; Kankare E
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2013 Apr; 38(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 22587654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Musical theater and opera singing--why so different? A study of subglottal pressure, voice source, and formant frequency characteristics.
    Björkner E
    J Voice; 2008 Sep; 22(5):533-40. PubMed ID: 17485197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Flow visualization and pressure distributions in a model of the glottis with a symmetric and oblique divergent angle of 10 degrees.
    Shinwari D; Scherer RC; DeWitt KJ; Afjeh AA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):487-97. PubMed ID: 12558286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Effect of the glottal source and the vocal tract on the partials amplitude of vibrato in male voices.
    Arroabarren I; Carlosena A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2483-97. PubMed ID: 16642861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Kinematic measurements of the vocal-fold displacement waveform in typical children and adult populations: quantification of high-speed endoscopic videos.
    Patel R; Donohue KD; Unnikrishnan H; Kryscio RJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 58(2):227-40. PubMed ID: 25652615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Comparison of maximum flow declination rate: children versus adults.
    Sapienza CM; Stathopoulos ET
    J Voice; 1994 Sep; 8(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 7987426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Just noticeable differences for glottal flow waveform characteristics.
    Scherer RC; Arehart KH; Guo CG; Milstein CF; Horii Y
    J Voice; 1998 Mar; 12(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 9619976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Perception of emotional valences and activity levels from vowel segments of continuous speech.
    Waaramaa T; Laukkanen AM; Airas M; Alku P
    J Voice; 2010 Jan; 24(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 19111438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. A role for the second subglottal resonance in lexical access.
    Lulich SM; Bachrach A; Malyska N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2320-7. PubMed ID: 17902867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. A Comparison of the Use of Glottal Fry in the Spontaneous Speech of Young and Middle-Aged American Women.
    Oliveira G; Davidson A; Holczer R; Kaplan S; Paretzky A
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):684-687. PubMed ID: 26427301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Speech synthesis by glottal excited linear prediction.
    Childers DG; Hu HT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Oct; 96(4):2026-36. PubMed ID: 7963019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Glottal characteristics of male speakers: acoustic correlates and comparison with female data.
    Hanson HM; Chuang ES
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):1064-77. PubMed ID: 10462811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Inverse filtering of nasalized vowels using synthesized speech.
    Gobl C; Mahshie J
    J Voice; 2013 Mar; 27(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 23231805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The effect of whisper and creak vocal mechanisms on vocal tract resonances.
    Swerdlin Y; Smith J; Wolfe J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2590-8. PubMed ID: 20370040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Comparing closed quotient in children singers' voices as measured by high-speed-imaging, electroglottography, and inverse filtering.
    Mecke AC; Sundberg J; Granqvist S; Echternach M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):435-41. PubMed ID: 22280605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Voice Register in Mon: Acoustics and Electroglottography.
    Abramson AS; Tiede MK; Luangthongkum T
    Phonetica; 2015; 72(4):237-56. PubMed ID: 26636544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.