BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12186056)

  • 1. Vegetative state patients: Mike Hinchliffe considers the cases.
    Hinchliffe M
    New Law J; 1996 Nov; 146(6766):1579-80, 85. PubMed ID: 12186056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical treatment--withdrawal of treatment--patient in persistent vegetative state: Airedale National Health Service Trust v Bland.
    Munby J; Francis R; Taylor MR; Lester A; Saini P
    New Law J; 1992 Dec; 142(6581):1755-8. PubMed ID: 16184671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Starved to death by order of the court.
    Oderberg DS
    Hum Life Rev; 2001; 27(3):103-12. PubMed ID: 11881671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incompetent patient (adult): Bland and the Human Rights Act 1998.
    Med Law Rev; 2000; 8(3):342-9. PubMed ID: 11885617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Letting live, letting die.
    Bull Med Ethics; 2004 Sep; (201):19-22. PubMed ID: 15685754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Artificial nutrition and hydration in patients in persistent vegetative state: continuing reflections.
    Atkinson A
    Ethics Med; 2000; 16(3):73-5. PubMed ID: 15040343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The state's interest in the preservation of life: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
    Peters PG
    Ohio State Law J; 1989; 50(4):891-977. PubMed ID: 16044607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Termination of life support measures in case of persons in permanent vegetative state.
    Simon J; Ravenstein C
    Not Polit; 2002; 18(65):219-26. PubMed ID: 15505921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Easing the passing: end of life decisions and the Medical Treatment (Prevention of Euthanasia) Bill.
    Morris A
    Med Law Rev; 2000; 8(3):300-15. PubMed ID: 11885616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Right to die--court requires clear and convincing evidence of persistent vegetative patient's intent to terminate life-sustaining procedures; Health Care Decisions Act of 1993 casts new light on outcome.
    Brindisi TJ
    Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1994; 23(2):619-44. PubMed ID: 16086514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The chronic vegetative patient: a Torah perspective.
    Friedman F
    J Halacha Contemporary Society; 1993; No. 26():88-109. PubMed ID: 11652653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 'Near PVS': a new medico-legal syndrome?
    Cusack DA; Sheikh AA; Hyslop-Westrup JL
    Med Sci Law; 2000 Apr; 40(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 10821024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. End-of-life decisions and the law.
    McLean S
    J Med Ethics; 1996 Oct; 22(5):261-2. PubMed ID: 8910775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The PVS debate.
    Orr RD; Harris CE
    Todays Christ Dr; 1999; 30(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 11657838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail.
    McLean ED
    Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The legal bounds of physician conduct hastening death.
    Cantor NL; Thomas GC
    Buffalo Law Rev; 2000; 48(1):83-173. PubMed ID: 12715817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Moving quickly, Senate approves Schiavo measures; allows review by judge; Bush rushes to capital to sign bill in clash over feeding tube case.
    Hulse C; Kirkpatrick DD
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Mar; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 15841510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Death and dying in America: Schiavo's implications.
    Wolf SM
    Minn Med; 2005 Jun; 88(6):34-5. PubMed ID: 16050306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The case for letting vegetative patients die.
    Jennett B
    Ethics Med; 1993; 9(3):40-4. PubMed ID: 11652744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The tyranny of judicial formalism: oral directives and clear and convincing evidence standard.
    Rich BA
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2002; 11(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 12082911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.