These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12186069)

  • 1. Prosecuting pregnant addicts for dealing to the unborn.
    Barrett K
    Ariz Law Rev; 1991; 33(1):221-37. PubMed ID: 12186069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A limited role for the legal system in responding to maternal substance abuse during pregnancy.
    Myers JE
    Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1991; 5(3):747-81. PubMed ID: 11651057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. State responses to substance abuse among pregnant women.
    Dailard C; Nash E
    Issues Brief (Alan Guttmacher Inst); 2000 Dec; (6):1-4. PubMed ID: 12134883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Winnipeg Child and Family Services v. D.F.G.: judicial interference with pregnant women in the alleged interest of the fetus.
    Rodgers S
    Alta Law Rev; 1998 Jul; 36(3):711-24. PubMed ID: 12455527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal rights and the prosecution of women for using drugs during pregnancy.
    Janssen ND
    Drake Law Rev; 2000; 48(4):741-68. PubMed ID: 12449973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sex, drugs, and pregnant addicts: an ethical and legal critique of societal responses to pregnant addicts.
    Oberman M
    J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 2131072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Child abuse is ruled out in birth case: mother's cocaine use at issue in court action.
    Johnson K
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Aug; ():B1, B4. PubMed ID: 11646956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From conception until birth: exploring the maternal duty to protect fetal health.
    Cook M
    Wash Univ Law Q; 2002; 80(4):1307-40. PubMed ID: 15164743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The legal community's response to drug use during pregnancy in the criminal sentencing and dependency contexts: a survey of judges, prosecuting attorneys, and defense attorneys in ten California counties.
    Becker B; Hora P
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1993; 2(2):527-75. PubMed ID: 11654111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Creating a causal connection: from prenatal drug use to imminent harm.
    Taylor LD
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1999; 25(3):383-401. PubMed ID: 11503807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When courts take charge of the unborn.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Jan; ():A1, A11. PubMed ID: 11646714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Illicit drug use by pregnant women.
    American Public Health Association
    Am J Public Health; 1991 Feb; 81(2):253-4. PubMed ID: 11642867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pregnant women and unborn children.
    Williams DW
    Solicit J; 1973 Feb; 117(5):79-81. PubMed ID: 11664217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relevance of illegality.
    Steinbock B
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 1544795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mother's rights can't be infringed to protect fetus, Supreme Court's landmark ruling states.
    Capen K
    CMAJ; 1997 Dec; 157(11):1586-7. PubMed ID: 9400417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Injuries to unborn children.
    Br Med J; 1974 Sep; 3(5932):695-7. PubMed ID: 11663152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The right of the fetus to be born free of drug addiction.
    Levine M
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():45-55. PubMed ID: 11661109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prosecuting maternal substance abusers: an unjustified and ineffective policy.
    Rubenstein L
    Yale Law Policy Rev; 1991; 9(1):130-60. PubMed ID: 11651569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dobson v. Dobson: tort liability for expectant mothers?
    Foley T
    Sask Law Rev; 1998; 61(1):177-98. PubMed ID: 16528855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Appeals court in Florida backs guilt for drug delivery by umbilical cord.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Apr; ():6. PubMed ID: 11646842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.