204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12186078)
1. Perry v. Louisiana: medical ethics on death row--is judicial intervention warranted?
Katz DL
Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(3):707-29. PubMed ID: 12186078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Role of psychiatrists in capital punishment cases : a review].
Nakajima N
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2002; 104(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 11985117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medicate-to-execute: current trends in death penalty jurisprudence and the perils of dual loyalty.
Shaivitz DS
J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(1):149-74. PubMed ID: 15468506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Restored to health to be put to death: reconciling the legal and ethical dilemmas of medicating to execute in Singleton v. Norris.
Hensl KB
Villanova Law Rev; 2004; 49(2):291-328. PubMed ID: 16485377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. New hearing on forced medication of inmate.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1990 Nov; ():A30. PubMed ID: 11646793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Between madness and death: the medicate-to-execute controversy.
Latzer B
Crim Justice Ethics; 2003; 22(2):3-14. PubMed ID: 15080128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Denouement of an execution competency case: is Perry pyrrhic?
Mossman D
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(2):269-84. PubMed ID: 8605411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Of pills and needs: involuntarily medicating the psychotic inmate when execution looms.
Cantor JD
Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):117-70. PubMed ID: 17111502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Death, ethics and the state.
Kalt BC
Harv J Law Public Policy; 2000; 23(2):487-550. PubMed ID: 12452157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication?
Dlugacz HA
Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():41-83. PubMed ID: 11659926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. State can make inmate sane enough to execute.
Liptak A
N Y Times Web; 2003 Feb; ():A1, A27. PubMed ID: 12812158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Treating criminal offenders in correctional contexts: identifying interests and distributing responsibilities.
Schopp RF
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(5):833-55. PubMed ID: 19784945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Seeking an answer: questioning the validity of forcible medication to ensure mental competency of those condemned to die.
Stricker BW
McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):317-40. PubMed ID: 15709265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Treating the condemned to death.
Sargent DA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Dec; 16(6):5-6. PubMed ID: 3804727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perry v. Louisiana: can a state treat an incompetent prisoner to ready him for execution?
Evans GL
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(3):249-70. PubMed ID: 1777688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Competency to be executed and forced medication: Singleton v. Norris.
Zonana HV
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(3):372-6. PubMed ID: 14584539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
Winick BJ
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Forcible medication: a new insanity defence.
Economist; 2003 Mar; 366(8313):31. PubMed ID: 15022679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant.
Siegel DM; Grudzinskas AJ; Pinals DA
Wis L Rev; 2001; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
