These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12186359)
1. Confounding and bias in epidemiological investigations. Hammal DM; Bell CL Pediatr Hematol Oncol; 2002 Sep; 19(6):375-81. PubMed ID: 12186359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantifying biases in causal models: classical confounding vs collider-stratification bias. Greenland S Epidemiology; 2003 May; 14(3):300-6. PubMed ID: 12859030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bias. Delgado-Rodríguez M; Llorca J J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 Aug; 58(8):635-41. PubMed ID: 15252064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sources of error in clinical research. Kumar R; Kumar S Indian Pediatr; 1996 Dec; 33(12):1029-32. PubMed ID: 9141804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Fundamental errors in observed researches]. Sørensen HT; Møller-Petersen J; Sabroe S; Vilstrup H Nord Med; 1994; 109(3):91-2. PubMed ID: 8139905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Molecular epidemiology: a tool for understanding mechanisms of disease. Boffetta P Eur J Surg Suppl; 2002; (587):62-9. PubMed ID: 16144203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Bias and confounding in the epidemiologic studies]. Ren T; Zhan ST; Shen X; Meng FY; Hu YH; Li LM Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 25(9):811-3. PubMed ID: 15555368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Causal diagrams for encoding and evaluation of information bias. Shahar E J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Jun; 15(3):436-40. PubMed ID: 19366394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analytic epidemiology and periodontal diseases. Heaton B; Dietrich T Periodontol 2000; 2012 Feb; 58(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 22133370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The healthy donor effect: a matter of selection bias and confounding. Atsma F; de Vegt F Transfusion; 2011 Sep; 51(9):1883-5. PubMed ID: 21790637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A positive or a negative confounding variable? A simple teaching aid for clinicians and students. Mehio-Sibai A; Feinleib M; Sibai TA; Armenian HK Ann Epidemiol; 2005 Jul; 15(6):421-3. PubMed ID: 15967387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Toward a clarification of the taxonomy of "bias" in epidemiology textbooks. Schwartz S; Campbell UB; Gatto NM; Gordon K Epidemiology; 2015 Mar; 26(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 25536455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative assessment of unobserved confounding is mandatory in nonrandomized intervention studies. Groenwold RH; Hak E; Hoes AW J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 18619797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bias in clinical epidemiological study designs. Rivas-Ruiz F; Pérez-Vicente S; González-Ramírez AR Allergol Immunopathol (Madr); 2013; 41(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 23036443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data. Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adjusting for selection bias in retrospective, case-control studies. Geneletti S; Richardson S; Best N Biostatistics; 2009 Jan; 10(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 18482997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]