154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12186440)
1. Use of serial FDG PET to measure the response of bone-dominant breast cancer to therapy.
Stafford SE; Gralow JR; Schubert EK; Rinn KJ; Dunnwald LK; Livingston RB; Mankoff DA
Acad Radiol; 2002 Aug; 9(8):913-21. PubMed ID: 12186440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Serial 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to monitor treatment of bone-dominant metastatic breast cancer predicts time to progression (TTP).
Specht JM; Tam SL; Kurland BF; Gralow JR; Livingston RB; Linden HM; Ellis GK; Schubert EK; Dunnwald LK; Mankoff DA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 17268819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective Study of Serial
Peterson LM; O'Sullivan J; Wu QV; Novakova-Jiresova A; Jenkins I; Lee JH; Shields A; Montgomery S; Linden HM; Gralow J; Gadi VK; Muzi M; Kinahan P; Mankoff D; Specht JM
J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1823-1830. PubMed ID: 29748233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography in the diagnosis of tumor recurrence and metastases in the follow-up of patients with breast carcinoma: a comparison to conventional imaging.
Gallowitsch HJ; Kresnik E; Gasser J; Kumnig G; Igerc I; Mikosch P; Lind P
Invest Radiol; 2003 May; 38(5):250-6. PubMed ID: 12750613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of 18F-FDG-PET/CT vs Bone Scintigraphy in Treatment Response Assessment of Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer.
Al-Muqbel KM; Yaghan RJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May; 95(21):e3753. PubMed ID: 27227942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients in the PET/CT era: Do we still need the bone scan?
Caglar M; Kupik O; Karabulut E; Høilund-Carlsen PF
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2016; 35(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 26514321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of sequential FDG-PET/CT for monitoring bone metastasis of breast cancer during therapy: correlation between morphological and metabolic changes with tumor markers.
Katayama T; Kubota K; Machida Y; Toriihara A; Shibuya H
Ann Nucl Med; 2012 Jun; 26(5):426-35. PubMed ID: 22477261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 18F-FDG PET/CT findings and circulating tumor cell counts in the monitoring of systemic therapies for bone metastases from breast cancer.
De Giorgi U; Mego M; Rohren EM; Liu P; Handy BC; Reuben JM; Macapinlac HA; Hortobagyi GN; Cristofanilli M; Ueno NT
J Nucl Med; 2010 Aug; 51(8):1213-8. PubMed ID: 20660382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel biomarker, active whole skeletal total lesion glycolysis (WS-TLG), as a quantitative method to measure bone metastatic activity in breast cancer patients.
Koizumi M; Motegi K; Umeda T
Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Jul; 33(7):502-511. PubMed ID: 30982124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Whole body PET for the evaluation of bony metastases in patients with breast cancer: comparison with 99Tcm-MDP bone scintigraphy.
Ohta M; Tokuda Y; Suzuki Y; Kubota M; Makuuchi H; Tajima T; Nasu S; Suzuki Y; Yasuda S; Shohtsu A
Nucl Med Commun; 2001 Aug; 22(8):875-9. PubMed ID: 11473206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metabolic activity in bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer were similar as studied by
Pietrzak A; Czepczynski R; Wierzchoslawska E; Cholewinski W
Hell J Nucl Med; 2017; 20(3):237-240. PubMed ID: 29177262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden from (18)F-FDG PET in surgical patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Zhang H; Wroblewski K; Liao S; Kampalath R; Penney BC; Zhang Y; Pu Y
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22999369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of prone versus supine 18F-FDG-PET of locally advanced breast cancer: Phantom and preliminary clinical studies.
Williams JM; Rani SD; Li X; Arlinghaus LR; Lee TC; MacDonald LR; Partridge SC; Kang H; Whisenant JG; Abramson RG; Linden HM; Kinahan PE; Yankeelov TE
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3801-13. PubMed ID: 26133582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 2-(fluorine-18)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.
Avril N; Dose J; Jänicke F; Ziegler S; Römer W; Weber W; Herz M; Nathrath W; Graeff H; Schwaiger M
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1996 Sep; 88(17):1204-9. PubMed ID: 8780629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. FDG PET uptake as a predictor of pain response in palliative radiation therapy in patients with bone metastasis.
Adli M; Kuzhan A; Alkis H; Andic F; Yilmaz M
Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):850-6. PubMed ID: 23985277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Positron emission tomography and bone metastases.
Fogelman I; Cook G; Israel O; Van der Wall H
Semin Nucl Med; 2005 Apr; 35(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 15765376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastases in breast cancer.
Hahn S; Heusner T; Kümmel S; Köninger A; Nagarajah J; Müller S; Boy C; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Stahl A
Acta Radiol; 2011 Nov; 52(9):1009-14. PubMed ID: 21969709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pitfalls of FDG-PET for the diagnosis of osteoblastic bone metastases in patients with breast cancer.
Nakai T; Okuyama C; Kubota T; Yamada K; Ushijima Y; Taniike K; Suzuki T; Nishimura T
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Nov; 32(11):1253-8. PubMed ID: 16133397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
