BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12186736)

  • 1. Numerical analysis of models of the standard TSRH spinal instrumentation: effect of rod cross-sectional shape.
    Cui Y; Lewis G; Qi G
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2002 Feb; 5(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 12186736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finite-element analysis for lumbar interbody fusion under axial loading.
    Lee KK; Teo EC; Fuss FK; Vanneuville V; Qiu TX; Ng HW; Yang K; Sabitzer RJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Mar; 51(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 15000370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanics of the aging spine.
    Board D; Stemper BD; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA; Shender B; Paskoff G
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2006; 42():1-6. PubMed ID: 16817576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of stainless steel and CP titanium rods for the anterior instrumentation of scoliosis.
    Haher T; Ottaviano D; Lapman P; Goldfarb B; Merola A; Valdevit A
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 14757955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spinal instrumentation for metastatic disease: in vitro biomechanical analysis.
    Heller JG; Zdeblick TA; Kunz DA; McCabe R; Cooke ME
    J Spinal Disord; 1993 Feb; 6(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 8439712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Static and dynamic analysis of five anterior instrumentation systems for thoracolumbar scoliosis.
    Shimamoto N; Kotani Y; Shono Y; Kadoya K; Abumi K; Minami A; Kaneda K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1678-85. PubMed ID: 12897491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anterior thoracolumbar instrumentation: stiffness and load sharing characteristics of plate and rod systems.
    Brodke DS; Gollogly S; Bachus KN; Alexander Mohr R; Nguyen BK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1794-801. PubMed ID: 12923465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Torsional stiffness of a single-rod construct using three instrumentation systems for thoracic scoliosis.
    Farley FA; Smith EA
    J Spinal Disord; 1999 Oct; 12(5):430-5. PubMed ID: 10549709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A thoracic spine testbed for the comparative biomechanical evaluation of spinal instrumentations.
    Lewis G; Drewry TD; Sherman MC
    J Spinal Disord; 1995 Jun; 8(3):186-94. PubMed ID: 7670208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
    Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of costotransverse process screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation of the upper thoracic spine.
    Little AS; Brasiliense LB; Lazaro BC; Reyes PM; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
    Neurosurgery; 2010 Mar; 66(3 Suppl Operative):178-82; discussion 182. PubMed ID: 20173568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of large compression loads on lumbar spine in flexion and in torsion using a novel wrapping element.
    Shirazi-Adl A
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 16321628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) model can provide results comparable to cadaveric models.
    Haher TR; Ottaviano D; DeFrancis JG; Merola A; Valdevit A
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 14757956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of soft tissue properties on spinal flexibility in scoliosis: biomechanical simulation of fulcrum bending.
    Little JP; Adam CJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):E76-82. PubMed ID: 19139657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A biomechanical analysis of an instrumented spinal fixator under torsional loads.
    Alkalay RN; Sharpe D; Bader DL
    J Biomech; 2005 Apr; 38(4):865-76. PubMed ID: 15713308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurements of constraint of total knee replacement.
    Haider H; Walker PS
    J Biomech; 2005 Feb; 38(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 15598462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite element analysis of a femoral retrograde intramedullary nail subject to gait loading.
    Cheung G; Zalzal P; Bhandari M; Spelt JK; Papini M
    Med Eng Phys; 2004 Mar; 26(2):93-108. PubMed ID: 15036177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of the rib cage on thoracic spine flexibility.
    Sham ML; Zander T; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Nov; 50(11):361-5. PubMed ID: 16370149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Restoration of compressive loading properties of lumbar discs with a nucleus implant-a finite element analysis study.
    Strange DG; Fisher ST; Boughton PC; Kishen TJ; Diwan AD
    Spine J; 2010 Jul; 10(7):602-9. PubMed ID: 20547110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.