129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12187337)
1. Comparison between sonography and mammography for breast cancer diagnosis in oriental women after augmentation mammaplasty.
Hou MF; Ou-Yang F; Chuang CH; Wang JY; Lee LW; Huang YS; Huang CJ; Hsieh JS; Lai CS; Lin SD; Huang TJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2002 Aug; 49(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 12187337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy of ultrasound, mammography and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting breast implant rupture: A retrospective study of 175 reconstructive and aesthetic sub-pectoral breast augmentation cases.
Stivala A; Rem K; Leuzzi S; Moris V; François C; Revol M; Cristofari S
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Nov; 70(11):1520-1526. PubMed ID: 28739171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of breast mammography, sonography and physical examination for screening women at high risk of breast cancer in taiwan.
Hou MF; Chuang HY; Ou-Yang F; Wang CY; Huang CL; Fan HM; Chuang CH; Wang JY; Hsieh JS; Liu GC; Huang TJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 Apr; 28(4):415-20. PubMed ID: 12049952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do mammography, sonography, and MR mammography have a diagnostic benefit compared with mammography and sonography?
Müller-Schimpfle M; Stoll P; Stern W; Kurz S; Dammann F; Claussen CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1323-9. PubMed ID: 9129436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging.
Hlawatsch A; Teifke A; Schmidt M; Thelen M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1493-501. PubMed ID: 12438043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The detection of breast cancer after augmentation mammaplasty.
Carlson GW; Curley SA; Martin JE; Fornage BD; Ames FC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1993 Apr; 91(5):837-40. PubMed ID: 8460186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Imaging of breast cancer after augmentation mammoplasty.
Leibman AJ; Kruse BD
Ann Plast Surg; 1993 Feb; 30(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 8387738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imaging of complications of augmentation mammaplasty.
Leibman AJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 May; 93(6):1134-40. PubMed ID: 8171131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Review of breast augmentation and reconstruction for the radiologist with emphasis on MRI.
Green LA; Karow JA; Toman JE; Lostumbo A; Xie K
Clin Imaging; 2018; 47():101-117. PubMed ID: 28918365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Negative predictive value of sonography and mammography in patients with focal breast pain.
Tumyan L; Hoyt AC; Bassett LW
Breast J; 2005; 11(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 16174154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis in women following augmentation with silicone gel-filled prostheses.
Silverstein MJ; Handel N; Gamagami P; Gierson ED; Furmanski M; Collins AR; Epstein M; Cohlan BF
Eur J Cancer; 1992; 28(2-3):635-40. PubMed ID: 1591087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sydney Breast Imaging Accuracy Study: Comparative sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in young women with symptoms.
Houssami N; Irwig L; Simpson JM; McKessar M; Blome S; Noakes J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):935-40. PubMed ID: 12646432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Negative predictive value of sonography with mammography in patients with palpable breast lesions.
Soo MS; Rosen EL; Baker JA; Vo TT; Boyd BA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1167-70. PubMed ID: 11641195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast Cancer Found Incidentally After Reduction Mammaplasty in Young Insured Women.
Vande Walle K; Yang DY; Stankowski-Drengler TJ; Livingston-Rosanoff D; Fernandes-Taylor S; Schumacher JR; Wilke LG; Greenberg CC; Neuman HB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Dec; 26(13):4310-4316. PubMed ID: 31538286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Considerations of previous augmentation in subsequent breast reconstruction.
Spear SL; Clemens MW; Dayan JH
Aesthet Surg J; 2008; 28(3):285-93. PubMed ID: 19083539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast cancer after mammary augmentation.
Schirber S; Thomas WO; Finley JM; Green AE; Ferrara JJ
South Med J; 1993 Mar; 86(3):263-8. PubMed ID: 8451662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Invasive lobular carcinoma: detection with mammography, sonography, MRI, and breast-specific gamma imaging.
Brem RF; Ioffe M; Rapelyea JA; Yost KG; Weigert JM; Bertrand ML; Stern LH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):379-83. PubMed ID: 19155397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of screening whole-breast sonography as a supplemental tool in conjunction with mammography in women with dense breasts.
Chae EY; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Kim H
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Sep; 32(9):1573-8. PubMed ID: 23980217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors associated with imaging and procedural events used to detect breast cancer after screening mammography.
Carney PA; Abraham LA; Miglioretti DL; Yabroff KR; Sickles EA; Buist DS; Kasales CJ; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Dignan MB; Weaver DL; Kerlikowske K;
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 17242246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast masses in the augmentation mammaplasty patient: the role of ultrasound.
Shestak KC; Ganott MA; Harris KM; Losken HW
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1993 Aug; 92(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 8337269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
