These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1218758)
1. [Hygienic features of working conditions prevailing in x-ray cabinets]. Usol'tsev VI; Serebrianyĭ VA Gig Sanit; 1975 Oct; (10):38-40. PubMed ID: 1218758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Experimental investigations of the dosimetric features of the x-ray radiation used in x-ray diagnosis]. Prostiakova MA Gig Sanit; 1975 Oct; (10):40-5. PubMed ID: 1218759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [A method of assessing the intensity of the radiation on the population of the RSFSR during medical x-ray examinations]. Kudritskiĭ IuK; Serebriannikov VD; Zakharenko IuS; Koroleva TM Gig Sanit; 1975 Dec; (12):52-6. PubMed ID: 129348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Change in the dosage strength along the radiation beam axis in x-ray apparatus]. Leshchinskiĭ NI; Nikulin IuP Radiobiologiia; 1977; 17(6):934-5. PubMed ID: 601207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [The level of irradiation of the personnel at an x-ray center of a modern hospital complex]. Rabkin IKh; Kirillov VF; Korenkov IP; Kaptsov VA Gig Sanit; 1975 Jun; (6):108-10. PubMed ID: 1213400 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Hygienic study of the working conditions in exposure to a complex of radiation and nonradiation factors]. Mikhalev VP Gig Sanit; 1977 Mar; (3):43-6. PubMed ID: 852711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [25 year assessment of occupational exposure to x-rays in Poland]. Jankowski J; Nowak B Med Pr; 1993; 44(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 8377643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Hygienic assessment of the radiation situation in x-ray diagnostic offices and means of improving it]. Zol' nikova NI; Stavitskiĭ RV; Trunov BV Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1981 Jun; (6):37-40. PubMed ID: 7250722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Role of phase x-ray analysis in the hygienic evaluation of aerosols formed as results of using low-temperature plasma for industrial purposes]. Il'nitskaia AV; Novikov IuV; Titova IN; Polynkova AA Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1974 Oct; (10):38-9. PubMed ID: 4465166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Interlaboratory comparison and accreditation in quality control testing of diagnostic X-ray equipment. Kepler K; Vladimirov A; Servomaa A Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):198-200. PubMed ID: 15933108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [New reinforcing screens using rare earth salts. Value in decreasing the incident dose (author's transl)]. Papagni L J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1977 Jan; 58(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 853483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [A new version of the x-ray regulation]. Tempel K Tierarztl Prax; 1987; 15(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 3424357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of flood source placement on radiation exposure during quality control testing. Rudin MJ; Johnson WH J Nucl Med Technol; 2000 Jun; 28(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 10824619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [An experience of using the DRK-1 dosimeter with conduit ionizing chamber for monitoring the parameters of X-ray diagnostic equipment]. Voronin KV; Okhrimenko SE Med Tekh; 2003; (5):35-7. PubMed ID: 14603849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. X-ray imaging physics for nuclear medicine technologists. Part 1: Basic principles of x-ray production. Seibert JA J Nucl Med Technol; 2004 Sep; 32(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 15347692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significance of radiation exposure from work-related chest X-rays for epidemiological studies of radiation workers. Cardarelli J; Spitz H; Rice C; Buncher R; Elson H; Succop P Am J Ind Med; 2002 Dec; 42(6):490-501. PubMed ID: 12439872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania. Sniureviciute M; Adliene D Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. X-rays: keeping the doses down. Russell JG; Gray JE World Health Forum; 1992; 13(2-3):213-7. PubMed ID: 1418351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A simple method for evaluation of half-value layer variation in CT equipment. Maia AF; Caldas LV Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1595-601. PubMed ID: 16510965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]