These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12187840)

  • 21. [The quality of mammography scrutinized. Ongoing control mass screenings for breast cancer is necessary].
    Andersson I; Rydén S; Karlberg I
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Aug; 92(35):3106-9. PubMed ID: 7658762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quality mammography standards--FDA. Proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1998 Nov; 63(214):59750-1. PubMed ID: 10187387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Quality assurance of mammography in the province of Trent].
    Valentini A; Nassivera E; Voltolini A; Volani M; Gottardi S
    Radiol Med; 1993 Sep; 86(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 8210532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Experiences with phantom measurements in different mammographic systems].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Lell M; Kuchar I; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2002 Oct; 174(10):1243-6. PubMed ID: 12375196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An alternative method for noise analysis using pixel variance as part of quality control procedures on digital mammography systems.
    Bouwman R; Young K; Lazzari B; Ravaglia V; Broeders M; van Engen R
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 54(22):6809-22. PubMed ID: 19847017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mammography. Part 2. Evaluation of equipment and guidelines for quality assurance.
    Zamenhof RG; Homer MJ
    Appl Radiol; 1984; 13(6):51-4. PubMed ID: 10268876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Legislative and regulatory mandates for mammography quality assurance.
    Fintor L; Alciati MH; Fischer R
    J Public Health Policy; 1995; 16(1):81-107. PubMed ID: 7738160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Quality control during mammography-II (author's transl)].
    Friedrich M
    Rofo; 1981 Mar; 134(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 6452372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
    Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quality control in mammary radiography.
    Karila K
    Acta Radiol Oncol; 1981; 20(3):213-21. PubMed ID: 6270982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Survey on image quality and dose levels used in Europe for mammography.
    Verdun FR; Moeckli R; Valley JF; Bochud F; Hessler C
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Aug; 69(824):762-8. PubMed ID: 8949680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Image quality in mammography: physical and technical limitations.
    Nielsen B
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1987; 105():1-14. PubMed ID: 3296052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Investigation of exposure factors in Japanese routine mammography.
    Fujisaki T; Takahashi S; Watanabe K; Nishimura K; Abe S; Saitoh H; Fukuda K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 Jul; 61(8):431-7. PubMed ID: 11524820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Objective assessment of mammography systems. Part I: Method.
    Hessler C; Depeursinge C; Grecescu M; Pochon Y; Raimondi S; Valley JF
    Radiology; 1985 Jul; 156(1):215-9. PubMed ID: 4001409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A quality assurance programme for mass screening in mammography.
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1989 Dec; 12(4):252-9. PubMed ID: 2610641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quality assurance in mammography.
    Dodd GD
    Cancer; 1989 Dec; 64(12 Suppl):2707-9. PubMed ID: 2819690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Why MQSA? Why now?
    Arcarese JS
    Radiol Technol; 1994; 66(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 7997527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Effectiveness of a quality control program in mammography for the Brazilian National Health System].
    Corrêa Rda S; Freitas-Junior R; Peixoto JE; Rodrigues DC; Lemos ME; Dias CM; Ferreira Rde S; Rahal RM
    Rev Saude Publica; 2012 Oct; 46(5):769-76. PubMed ID: 23128252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Canadian test screens mammogram readers.
    Wagner SK
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1994 Sep; 16(9):63-5. PubMed ID: 10150904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. ACR-AAPM-SIIM practice guideline for determinants of image quality in digital mammography.
    Kanal KM; Krupinski E; Berns EA; Geiser WR; Karellas A; Mainiero MB; Martin MC; Patel SB; Rubin DL; Shepard JD; Siegel EL; Wolfman JA; Mian TA; Mahoney MC
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Feb; 26(1):10-25. PubMed ID: 22992865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.