142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12188187)
1. Recovery of adherent cells after in situ electroporation monitored electrically.
Wegener J; Keese CR; Giaever I
Biotechniques; 2002 Aug; 33(2):348, 350, 352 passim. PubMed ID: 12188187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impedance analysis of adherent cells after in situ electroporation: non-invasive monitoring during intracellular manipulations.
Stolwijk JA; Hartmann C; Balani P; Albermann S; Keese CR; Giaever I; Wegener J
Biosens Bioelectron; 2011 Aug; 26(12):4720-7. PubMed ID: 21684144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrode assemblies used for electroporation of cultured cells.
Raptis L; Firth KL
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 423():61-76. PubMed ID: 18370190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electroporation of adherent cells in situ for the introduction of nonpermeant molecules.
Raptis LH; Firth KL; Brownell HL; Todd A; Simon WC; Bennett BM; MacKenzie LW; Zannis-Hadjopoulos M
Methods Mol Biol; 1995; 48():93-113. PubMed ID: 8528412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Applications of electroporation of adherent cells in situ, on a partly conductive slide.
Raptis LH; Brownell HL; Liu SK; Firth KL; MacKenzie LW; Stiles CD; Alberta JA
Mol Biotechnol; 1995 Oct; 4(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 8556428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electroporation of adherent cells in situ for the study of signal transduction and gap junctional communication.
Raptis L; Vultur A; Brownell HL; Tomai E; Anagnostopoulou A; Arulanandam R; Cao J; Firth KL
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 423():173-89. PubMed ID: 18370198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A functional assay for gap junctional examination; electroporation of adherent cells on indium-tin oxide.
Geletu M; Guy S; Firth K; Raptis L
J Vis Exp; 2014 Oct; (92):e51710. PubMed ID: 25350637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Examination of gap junctional, intercellular communication by in situ electroporation on two co-planar indium-tin oxide electrodes.
Anagnostopoulou A; Cao J; Vultur A; Firth K; Raptis L
Mol Oncol; 2007 Sep; 1(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 19383296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of the electrode material on ROS generation and electroporation efficiency in low and high frequency nanosecond pulse range.
Ruzgys P; Novickij V; Novickij J; Šatkauskas S
Bioelectrochemistry; 2019 Jun; 127():87-93. PubMed ID: 30769178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optically transparent polymer devices for in situ assessment of cell electroporation.
Majhi AK; Thrivikraman G; Basu B; Venkataraman V
Eur Biophys J; 2015 Feb; 44(1-2):57-67. PubMed ID: 25502470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Blumlein configuration for high-repetition-rate pulse generation of variable duration and polarity using synchronized switch control.
Rebersek M; Kranjc M; Pavliha D; Batista-Napotnik T; Vrtacnik D; Amon S; Miklavcic D
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Nov; 56(11):2642-8. PubMed ID: 19635688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impedance analysis of adherent cells after in situ electroporation-mediated delivery of bioactive proteins, DNA and nanoparticles in µL-volumes.
Stolwijk JA; Wegener J
Sci Rep; 2020 Dec; 10(1):21331. PubMed ID: 33288771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrotransfection of anchorage-dependent mammalian cells.
Müller KJ; Horbaschek M; Lucas K; Zimmermann U; Sukhorukov VL
Exp Cell Res; 2003 Aug; 288(2):344-53. PubMed ID: 12915125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electroporation-induced formation of individual calcium entry sites in the cell body and processes of adherent cells.
Teruel MN; Meyer T
Biophys J; 1997 Oct; 73(4):1785-96. PubMed ID: 9336174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electroporation of cells using EM induction of ac fields by a magnetic stimulator.
Chen C; Evans JA; Robinson MP; Smye SW; O'Toole P
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1219-29. PubMed ID: 20124654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of interphase and interpulse delay in high-frequency irreversible electroporation pulses on cell survival, membrane permeabilization and electrode material release.
Vižintin A; Vidmar J; Ščančar J; Miklavčič D
Bioelectrochemistry; 2020 Aug; 134():107523. PubMed ID: 32272337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Soft electroporation for delivering molecules into tightly adherent mammalian cells through 3D hollow nanoelectrodes.
Caprettini V; Cerea A; Melle G; Lovato L; Capozza R; Huang JA; Tantussi F; Dipalo M; De Angelis F
Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):8524. PubMed ID: 28819252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nonlinear current response of micro electroporation and resealing dynamics for human cancer cells.
He H; Chang DC; Lee YK
Bioelectrochemistry; 2008 Apr; 72(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 18314398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Plasma membrane depolarization and permeabilization due to electric pulses in cell lines of different excitability.
Dermol-Černe J; Miklavčič D; Reberšek M; Mekuč P; Bardet SM; Burke R; Arnaud-Cormos D; Leveque P; O'Connor R
Bioelectrochemistry; 2018 Aug; 122():103-114. PubMed ID: 29621662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conductive nanoparticles improve cell electropermeabilization.
Ghorbel A; Mir LM; García-Sánchez T
Nanotechnology; 2019 Dec; 30(49):495101. PubMed ID: 31422958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
