These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12188214)

  • 21. Functional anatomy of the deer spine: an appropriate biomechanical model for the human spine?
    Kumar N; Kukreti S; Ishaque M; Sengupta DK; Mulholland RC
    Anat Rec; 2002 Feb; 266(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 11788944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. New method for determining apparent axial center of rotation of lumbar and thoracic spine segments.
    Samagh SP; Rosen CD; Otarodifard K; Kornswiet M; Palmer G; Lee TQ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2011; 48(5):587-96. PubMed ID: 21674408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The feasibility of modal testing for measurement of the dynamic characteristics of goat vertebral motion segments.
    van Engelen SJ; van der Veen AJ; de Boer A; Ellenbroek MH; Smit TH; van Royen BJ; van Dieën JH
    J Biomech; 2011 May; 44(8):1478-83. PubMed ID: 21450293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Axial rotation mechanics in a cadaveric lumbar spine model: a biomechanical analysis.
    Doulgeris JJ; Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Aghayev K; Shea TM; Lee WE; Hess DP; Vrionis FD
    Spine J; 2014 Jul; 14(7):1272-9. PubMed ID: 24295796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vitro biomechanical characteristics of the spine: a comparison between human and porcine spinal segments.
    Busscher I; van der Veen AJ; van Dieën JH; Kingma I; Verkerke GJ; Veldhuizen AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(2):E35-42. PubMed ID: 20081499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Characterization and prediction of rate-dependent flexibility in lumbar spine biomechanics at room and body temperature.
    Stolworthy DK; Zirbel SA; Howell LL; Samuels M; Bowden AE
    Spine J; 2014 May; 14(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 24290312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Do flexion/extension postures affect the in vivo passive lumbar spine response to applied axial twist moments?
    Drake JD; Callaghan JP
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Jun; 23(5):510-9. PubMed ID: 18234402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An in vitro model of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Melnyk AD; Kingwell SP; Zhu Q; Chak JD; Cripton PA; Fisher CG; Dvorak MF; Oxland TR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(14):E870-7. PubMed ID: 23558441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The influence of slouching and lumbar support on iliolumbar ligaments, intervertebral discs and sacroiliac joints.
    Snijders CJ; Hermans PF; Niesing R; Spoor CW; Stoeckart R
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 May; 19(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 15109750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evidence for IHA migration during axial rotation of a lumbar spine segment by using a novel high-resolution 6D kinematic tracking system.
    Mansour M; Spiering S; Lee C; Dathe H; Kalscheuer AK; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Nägerl H
    J Biomech; 2004 Apr; 37(4):583-92. PubMed ID: 14996572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Adaptation of a clinical fixation device for biomechanical testing of the lumbar spine.
    Bell KM; Oh A; Cook HA; Yan Y; Lee JY
    J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 69():164-168. PubMed ID: 29397109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Formalin fixation strongly influences biomechanical properties of the spine.
    Wilke HJ; Krischak S; Claes LE
    J Biomech; 1996 Dec; 29(12):1629-31. PubMed ID: 8945663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Anteroposterior shear stiffness of the upper thoracic spine at quasi-static and dynamic loading rates-An in vitro biomechanical study.
    Yamamoto S; Dias L; Street J; Cripton PA; Oxland TR
    J Orthop Res; 2022 Jul; 40(7):1687-1694. PubMed ID: 34669215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A numerical study to determine the effect of ligament stiffness on kinematics of the lumbar spine during flexion.
    Putzer M; Auer S; Malpica W; Suess F; Dendorfer S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Feb; 17():95. PubMed ID: 26905410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prospective design delineation and subsequent in vitro evaluation of a new posterior dynamic stabilization system.
    Wilke HJ; Heuer F; Schmidt H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 19179920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A standardized representation of spinal quality of motion.
    Zirbel SA; Stolworthy DK; Howell LL; Bowden AE
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Nov; 228(11):1168-75. PubMed ID: 25500861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis.
    Slucky AV; Brodke DS; Bachus KN; Droge JA; Braun JT
    Spine J; 2006; 6(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 16413452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biomechanical comparison of effects of the Dynesys and Coflex dynamic stabilization systems on range of motion and loading characteristics in the lumbar spine: a finite element study.
    Kulduk A; Altun NS; Senkoylu A
    Int J Med Robot; 2015 Dec; 11(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 25643936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Spinal manipulation force and duration affect vertebral movement and neuromuscular responses.
    Colloca CJ; Keller TS; Harrison DE; Moore RJ; Gunzburg R; Harrison DD
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Mar; 21(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 16378668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Computational model of the lumbar spine musculature: implications of spinal surgery.
    Gatton ML; Pearcy MJ; Pettet GJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Feb; 26(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 20956031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.