171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12188364)
1. Statistical approaches to estimating mean water quality concentrations with detection limits.
Shumway RH; Azari RS; Kayhanian M
Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Aug; 36(15):3345-53. PubMed ID: 12188364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
Hewett P; Ganser GH
Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimators of the local false discovery rate designed for small numbers of tests.
Padilla M; Bickel DR
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Oct; 11(5):4. PubMed ID: 23079518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating the mean and standard deviation of environmental data with below detection limit observations: Considering highly skewed data and model misspecification.
Shoari N; Dubé JS; Chenouri S
Chemosphere; 2015 Nov; 138():599-608. PubMed ID: 26210025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An accurate substitution method for analyzing censored data.
Ganser GH; Hewett P
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Apr; 7(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 20169489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methods for Handling Left-Censored Data in Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment.
Canales RA; Wilson AM; Pearce-Walker JI; Verhougstraete MP; Reynolds KA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Oct; 84(20):. PubMed ID: 30120116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of counts with two latent classes, with application to risk assessment based on physician-visit records of cancer survivors.
Wang H; Hu XJ; McBride ML; Spinelli JJ
Biostatistics; 2014 Apr; 15(2):384-97. PubMed ID: 24297607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
Zhao Y; Frey HC
Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The European bathing water directive: application and consequences in quality monitoring programs.
López Martínez I; Alvarez Díaz C; Gil Díaz JL; Revilla Cortezón JA; Juanes JA
J Environ Monit; 2010 Jan; 12(1):369-76. PubMed ID: 20082034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimation of the mixing proportion in a mixture of two normal distributions from simple, rapid measurements.
James IR
Biometrics; 1978 Jun; 34(2):265-75. PubMed ID: 667273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-iterative robust estimators of variance components in within-subject designs.
Mehrotra DV
Stat Med; 1997 Jul; 16(13):1465-79. PubMed ID: 9249919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for air toxic emission inventories with censored emission factor data.
Frey HC; Zhao Y
Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Nov; 38(22):6094-100. PubMed ID: 15573612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimax Estimation of Functionals of Discrete Distributions.
Jiao J; Venkat K; Han Y; Weissman T
IEEE Trans Inf Theory; 2015 May; 61(5):2835-2885. PubMed ID: 29375152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Box-Cox transformation on power of Haseman-Elston and maximum-likelihood variance components tests to detect quantitative trait Loci.
Etzel CJ; Shete S; Beasley TM; Fernandez JR; Allison DB; Amos CI
Hum Hered; 2003; 55(2-3):108-16. PubMed ID: 12931049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maximum likelihood estimates of mean and variance of occupation radiation doses subjected to minimum detection levels.
Datta D; Singh S; Johnson BE; Kushwaha HS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 18083720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nearly unbiased estimators for the three-parameter Weibull distribution with greater efficiency than the iterative likelihood method.
Cousineau D
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):167-91. PubMed ID: 18177546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Shrinkage estimation of effect sizes as an alternative to hypothesis testing followed by estimation in high-dimensional biology: applications to differential gene expression.
Montazeri Z; Yanofsky CM; Bickel DR
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article23. PubMed ID: 20597849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating the mean value of occupational exposures.
Zhou XH
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Nov; 59(11):785-8. PubMed ID: 9830086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distribution-based maximum likelihood estimation methods are preferred for estimating Salmonella concentration in chicken when contamination data are highly left-censored.
Sun T; Liu Y; Gao S; Qin X; Lin Z; Dou X; Wang X; Zhang H; Dong Q
Food Microbiol; 2023 Aug; 113():104283. PubMed ID: 37098436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modeling observations with a detection limit using a truncated normal distribution with censoring.
Williams JR; Kim HW; Crespi CM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):170. PubMed ID: 32600261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
